Lawyers have called for the Scottish Legal Aid Board to be scrapped, saving an estimated GBP40 million over five years, and ensuring the poorest can continue to access justice in the face of budget cuts. The Law Society of Scotland's access to justice committee has proposed merging the board with Scottish Legal Complaints Commission, creating a one-stop-shop.
I refer to the letter from John McGovern, president of the Glasgow Bar Association (The Herald, November 9). Clearly Mr McGovern and his colleagues have concerns about what the Scottish Government's budget decisions will mean for solicitors. From the Scottish Legal Aid Board's perspective, we hope ministers will be able to maintain or, where necessary, improve access to justice at a difficult time for public finances. Achieving this will require substantial further efficiencies in the way legal aid operates. This is likely to mean changes in how the board and the legal profession operate legal aid. These are challenges we need to face in a co-operative and constructive manner.
Mike Dailly made reference to legal aid expenditure and the Scottish Legal Aid Board's running costs (Letters, November 10). Unfortunately, Mr Dailly's use of figures is incorrect and may mislead. He refers to the legal aid fund of pound(s)150m and states: "Once you subtract the money solicitors recover from opponents, third party outlays and VAT, the budget is closer to pound(s)89m." However, the figure of pound(s)150m is actually the net figure after deducting recoveries and applicants' contributions of around pound(s)12m. The gross expenditure from the legal aid fund has been between pound(s)160m-pound(s)167m over the past three to four years.
A JUDGE has hit out at the Scottish Legal Aid Board and ordered it to pay a man's GBP 33,500 bill for defending himself in court against his former partner. Lord Brodie heard that the board had continued to fund the woman's cases despite repeated warnings it had been duped and that the granting of legal aid was "an abuse of process".
A JUDGE has ordered the Scottish Legal Aid Board to pick up a man's bill for defending court actions funded by taxpayers' cash brought against him by a former partner. Solicitors acting for William Bohannon repeatedly raised problems in the action against him with the board and asked, without success, that legal aid granted to Carol Young be suspended.
A JUDGE has hit out at the Scottish Legal Aid Board (Slab) and ordered it to pay a man's GBP 33,500 bill for defending himself in court against his former partner. Lord Brodie heard that the board had continued to fund the woman's cases, despite repeated warnings that it had been duped and that the granting of legal aid was "an abuse of process".
He failed to disclose that some of the Pounds 55,000 he had received in legal aid to advise solicitors acting on behalf of families who claimed their children had been harmed by the MMR jab went towards wages of his staff. The GMC's verdict: 'Dr Wakefield had a duty to disclose this information to the Legal Aid Board. It was dishonest and misleading of him not to have done so.'
TENS of thousands of bank customers who hoped to get refunds for alleged unfair charges have had their hopes dashed after the Scottish Legal Aid Board (Slab) refused to fund a major test case. The board rejected a legal aid claim from Jennifer Sharp of Glasgow who has been trying to get her money back from the Bank of Scotland since 2007.
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United Kingdom
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other interesting searches:
agricultural statistics canada | economies of scale ppt | Solar energy end-use applications | england map | latin american studies | Huh Jung-moo | University College Republicans | Office Communicator | personal data privacy ordinance | Japan Chamber Of Commerce And Industry., The
