Compensatory Remedies in UK Law

In this Topic
Leading Cases
  • Kuddus v Chief Constable of Leicestershire Constabulary
    • House of Lords
    • 07 Jun 2001

    Exemplary damages or punitive damages, the terms are synonymous, stand apart from awards of compensatory damages. They are additional to an award which is intended to compensate a plaintiff fully for the loss he has suffered, both pecuniary and non-pecuniary. They are intended to punish and deter.

    From time to time cases do arise where awards of compensatory damages are perceived as inadequate to achieve a just result between the parties. On occasion conscious wrongdoing by a defendant is so outrageous, his disregard of the plaintiff's rights so contumelious, that something more is needed to show that the law will not tolerate such behaviour. Without an award of exemplary damages, justice will not have been done.

    In my opinion the power to award exemplary damages in such cases serves to uphold and vindicate the rule of law because it makes clear that the courts will not tolerate such conduct. It serves to deter such actions in future as such awards will bring home to officers in command of individual units that discipline must be maintained at all times.

  • Rowlands v Chief Constable of Merseyside Police
    • Court of Appeal
    • 20 Dic 2006

    Whether damages awarded to compensate the claimant for distress, humiliation and injury to feelings are treated as part of the basic damages (as Thomas L.J. suggested in Richardson v Howie [2004] EWCA Civ 1127, (unreported, 13 th August 2004)) or are separately identified by the name of aggravated damages, the important factor to bear in mind is that they are primarily intended to be compensatory, not punitive.

    Only by this means can awards of an adequate amount be made against those who bear public responsibility for the conduct of the officers concerned.

  • The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Enfield v (1) Outdoor Plus Ltd (2) J C Decaux (UK) Ltd
    • Court of Appeal
    • 09 May 2012

    For that purpose, it has to be assumed that the hypothetical negotiation would have resulted in an agreement, even if the parties might in fact have refused or been unwilling to agree. It also has to be assumed that the actual trespass which has occurred would in fact take place, because the whole point of the exercise is to reach a reasonable measure of compensation to the claimant for that trespass.

  • Alltrans Express Ltd v CVA Holdings Ltd
    • Court of Appeal
    • 10 Nov 1983

    Before a court can interfere it must be shown that the judge has either erred in principle in his approach, or has left out of account, or taken into account, some feature that he should, or should not, have considered, or that his decision is wholly wrong, because the court is forced to the conclusion that he has not balanced the various factors fairly in the scale.

See all results
See all results
Books & Journal Articles
  • Bubbins v United Kingdom: Civil Remedies and the Right to Life
    • Núm. 69-2, Marzo 2006
    • The Modern Law Review
    This analysis considers the judgement of the European Court of Human Rights in Bubbins v United Kingdom.1 In this case the Court examined the shooting by the police of an unarmed individual. The Co...
  • Profits from Wrongdoing: Private and Public Law Perspectives
    • Núm. 62-2, Marzo 1999
    • The Modern Law Review
  • Remedies for Breach of Trust
    • Núm. 78-4, Julio 2015
    • The Modern Law Review
    The decision of the Supreme Court in AIB Group (UK) Plc v Mark Redler & Co confirms the approach taken by Lord Browne‐Wilkinson in Target Holdings Ltd v Redferns: where a trustee misapplies tru...
  • Missing Reliance
    • Núm. 63-6, Noviembre 2000
    • The Modern Law Review
    Book reviewed in this article: Andrew Burrows, Understanding the Law of Obligations: Essays on Contract,Tort and Restitution
See all results
Law Firm Commentaries
  • New Era Of Collective Actions In Europe?
    • Mondaq UK
    ......, 2018, introduces, in a proposal for a directive, an EU-wide compensatory redress mechanism to protect the collective interests of consumers. The ... having transparent funding arrangements); A variety of possible remedies in addition to injunctive relief (which is already available), in ......
  • ERISA Implications For A Personal Accident Claim In The US
    • Mondaq UK
    ...... Secondly, the remedies and relief available under ERISA are also different as compared to those ..., the plan participant cannot recover extra-contractual, compensatory, or punitive/bad faith damages under ERISA - remedies that are only ......
  • Part-Time Working in the United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    ...... by way of a monetary award consisting of a basic award, a compensatory award and a possible award for injury to feelings. Reinstatement or gagement are possible remedies, but they are almost never ordered. Indeed, in these cases, reinstatement ......
  • Complex Commercial Litigation Law Review – England & Wales
    • JD Supra United Kingdom
    Courts of England are some of the most established fora for dealing with complex commercial litigation. The Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) that govern litigation are robust and provide a clear framewo...
See all results