Crime and Sentencing in UK Law
- Ladd v Marshall
-
R (Razgar) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
...... well-being of the country and the prevention of disorder and crime. . . 8 The Court concluded that implementation of ......
- R v Turnbull
-
Rookes v Barnard
......They would mean that, short of committing a crime, an individual could with impunity virtually compel a third person to do ......
-
Three Rivers District Council v Governor and Company of the Bank of England (No. 3)
......1453 , at 1458. The tort bears some resemblance to the crime of misconduct in public office: Reg. v. Bowden [1996] 1 W.L.R. 98 . . ......
- Madarassy v Nomura International Plc
-
R v Galbraith
...... those cases where the minimum evidence to establish the facts of the crime has not been called. It is not the judge's job to weigh the evidence, ......
- Birkett v James
-
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody ; R v Same, ex parte Pierson ; R v Same, ex parte Smart ; R v Same, ex parte Pegg
....... Lord Mustill My Lords, . 5 The sentencing of a convicted murderer according to English law is a unique formality. ...This singularity is not to be accounted for by the fact that the crime has resulted in the death of the victim, since although the offence of ......
- Evans v Bartlam
See all results