Debt in UK Law

The contractual right to receive payment of a debt is an item of property, that is to say, a chose in action. It can be transferred by the creditor to a third party but the validity of the transfer necessarily depends upon the lex situs because the Courts of the country where the debt is have jurisdiction over the title to it. Moreover, in novation a creditor may be vitally prejudiced, whereas it is immaterial to a debtor to whom he pays his debt provided that he gets a good discharge for it.

They do not rank pari passu if the sterling creditors are required to underwrite the exchange rate of the pound for the benefit of the foreign currency creditors. The just course, as it seems to me, is to value the foreign debt once and for all at an appropriate date, and to keep to that rate of conversion throughout the liquidation until all debts have been paid in full.

If the creditor petitions to wind up a company, or claims in a liquidation initiated by others, he is not engaged in proceedings to establish the company's liability or the quantum of the liability (although liability and quantum may be put in issue) but to enforce the liability. The liquidation of an insolvent company is a process of collective enforcement of debts for the benefit of the general body of creditors.

It is a means by which the court regulates the legal relationships between a plaintiff and a defendant or defendants in order to prevent unjust enrichment. It is a means by which the court regulates the legal relationships between a plaintiff and a defendant or defendants in order to prevent unjust enrichment.

That is well established as a principle of discretion on which the Court acts."

Nothing put forward in evidence or in argument has given us the least reason to suppose that Mrs Masri could be at any risk of being ordered to pay the debt a second time to her husband.

The decisions were on different statutes inter se and from the Finance Act 1965 and it is difficult to find any clear common principle underlying them, but taking such guidance as they do provide leads me to think that the only basis on which a distinction can be drawn is between a pure unsecured debt as between the original borrower and lender on the one hand and a debt (which may be unsecured) which has, if not a marketable character at least such characteristics as enable it to be dealt in and if necessary converted into shares or other securities.