Design in UK Law
-
Oakley Inc. v Animal Ltd
... ... If the 1949 Act applied without any amendment by the 2001 Regulations, that Registered Design was thus invalid. If the 2001 Regulations applied including Regulation 12, since that would maintain in force the 1949 Act the Registered Design was ... ...
-
Matsushita Electric Industrial Company v Comptroller-General of Patents
... ... Commerciality required it and this was recognised in United States law and practice, and indeed in United Kingdom design right practice ... 37 17. Mr. Tappin, who appears for the Comptroller, supported the hearing officer's decision, essentially for the reasons given ... ...
-
Lucasfilm Ltd v Ainsworth
... ... It was an enormous commercial success. It won an Oscar for best costume design. This appeal is concerned with intellectual property rights in various artefacts made for use in the film. The most important of these was the ... ...
-
British Leyland Motor Corporation Ltd v Armstrong Patents Company Ltd
... ... These objects in themselves do not attract copyright protection; nor are they patentable, since they embody no new invention, and their design is not registrable under the registered designs legislation since they have no "eye appeal." Thus there has arisen the anomaly that in effect (though ... ...
- Amp Inc. v Utilux Pty. Ltd
-
King Features Syndicate Inc. v Kleeman (O. & M.) Ltd
... ... " "(2) General rules under Section 86 of the Patents and Designs Act, 1907, may be made for determining the conditions under which a design shall be deemed to be used for such purposes as aforesaid." ... 10 It should here be mentioned that the vital question ... ...
-
Re Halliburton Energy Services Inc.'s Patent Applications
... ... The invention is concerned with improving the design of roller cone drill bits for drilling oil wells (and the like). The point is to increase their drilling efficiency and their operational life. The ... ...
-
Procter & Gamble Company v Reckitt Benckiser (UK) Ltd
... ... 1 This is an appeal from a judgment of Lewison J, [2006] EWHC 3154 (Ch) ... He held P&G's registered community design (“RCD”) No, 000097969–0001 valid and infringed. The indication of the products to which the design is intended to be applied is “sprayers” ... ...
-
Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd v Apple Inc. (No 2)
... ... ) , Judge Birss held that three Samsung Galaxy tablet computers, the 10.1, the 8.9 and the 7.7 did not infringe Apple's registered Community Design No. 000181607–0001. By the second, of 18 th July 2012, [2012] EWHC 2049 (Pat) , he held that Apple should be compelled to publicise the fact ... ...
-
Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Unilever Plc; Unilever Plc's Trade Mark Application
... ... Unilever indeed registered the shape as a design, a point not actually even put in evidence before the Registry even though the Viennetta box gives the registered design number. Nestlé recognise it ... ...
See all results