Effluent in UK Law
-
National Rivers Authority v Yorkshire Water Services Ltd
“
In applying the words of the statute in the light of the decision of this House in Alphacell Ltd. v. Woodward, I am of opinion that Yorkshire Water Services having set up a system for gathering effluent into their sewers and thence into their sewage works there to be treated, with an arrangement deliberately intended to carry the results of that treatment into controlled waters, the special circumstances surrounding the entry of iso-octanol into their sewers and works does not preclude the conclusion that Yorkshire Water Services caused the resulting poisonous, noxious and polluting matter to enter the controlled waters, notwithstanding that the constitution of the effluent so entering was affected by the presence of iso-octanol. In applying the words of the statute in the light of the decision of this House in Alphacell Ltd. v. Woodward, I am of opinion that Yorkshire Water Services having set up a system for gathering effluent into their sewers and thence into their sewage works there to be treated, with an arrangement deliberately intended to carry the results of that treatment into controlled waters, the special circumstances surrounding the entry of iso-octanol into their sewers and works does not preclude the conclusion that Yorkshire Water Services caused the resulting poisonous, noxious and polluting matter to enter the controlled waters, notwithstanding that the constitution of the effluent so entering was affected by the presence of iso-octanol.
I think it is important and in accordance with the exposition given in Alphacell Ltd. v. Woodward that the word "cause" is to be used in its ordinary sense in these provisions and it is not right as a matter of law to add further requirements. I think it is important and in accordance with the exposition given in Alphacell Ltd. v. Woodward that the word "cause" is to be used in its ordinary sense in these provisions and it is not right as a matter of law to add further requirements.
- Trade Effluent (Asbestos) (Scotland) Regulations 1993
- Trade Effluent (Registers) (Scotland) Regulations 1998
-
The Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016
... ... 2(1) of Part 1 of Schedule 25; “ effluent ” has the same meaning as in the 1991 Act; “ ... ...
-
Water Industry Act 1991
... ... to its existing and likely future obligations to allow for the discharge of trade effluent into its public sewers; and (b) ... ...
-
Toward a total-cost approach to environmental instrument choice
Most theories of environmental instrument choice focus exclusively on differential compliance costs. But compliance costs comprise only part of the total costs of environmental protection. Administ...... ... cost differentials may offset the compliance cost advantages commonly associated with economic instruments, such as tradeable permits and effluent taxes. Moreover, measurement and monitoring constraints may increase ex ante uncertainty over the differential costs and benefits of ... ...
-
Life cycle analysis and sustainability assessment of advanced wastewater treatment technologies
Purpose: Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) have long-time environmental impacts. The purpose of this paper is to assess the environmental footprint of two advanced wastewater treatment (WWT) tech...... ... emissions a ssociated with elect ricity production requ ired to operate the WWTPs , chemicalusage, emissions to wa ter from treated effluent and heavy metal em issions from waste sludge applied toland are the major cont ributors for overall environmental imp acts. SBR is found to be the ... ...
-
Comments on paper by Daniel H. Cole and Peter Z. Grossman
... ... the economics of pollution control, I found that it deals with monitoring and enforcement costs in the context of comparing effluent fees with command-and-control (Burrows, 1979, pp. 133-135). And, albeit with less rigour, the consideration of these costs features in ... ...
-
THE CRIMINAL WASTE DISCHARGER1
... ... Here the firm is allowed to dis- charge effluent, provided it does not exceed a specified level, called the consent. Once this consent is exceeded the discharge becomes illegal. This ... ...
-
African mine victims entitled to sue holding company in the UK
The English Court of Appeal has allowed Zambian citizens from the Copperbelt to sue the holding company of a Zambian mining company that allegedly caused pollution and environmental damage resultin...... ... The processing and disposal of tailings and other effluent from a mine operated by the local mining company allegedly caused the pollution and environmental damage. The court applied the duty of care under ... ...
-
Application Of Integrated Pollution Prevention And Control To Waste Water Treatment
... ... In a specific example where beer effluent and milk effluent is pre-treated at a site 700 or 800 metres from the brewery and the milk processing plant from which it originates, before being ... ...
-
Domestic Septic Tanks More Time To Comply
... ... , the owners of existing septic tanks can now, to a certain extent, relax and take some time formulating a plan to deal with their liquid effluent ... Plans to upgrade septic tanks that discharge to surface water should consider the following options: ... Connecting the residence to the ... ...
-
The cost of non-compliance
Thames Water has received a record £20.3 million fine for water pollution. The fine is ten times higher than the previous largest fine of £2 million (given to Southern Water in December 2016).... ... The company pleaded guilty to offences involving the release of untreated effluent into the River Thames at six sites in Oxfordshire and Buckinghamshire in 2013 and 2014. Factors which contributed to the severity of the fine ... ...