Infringement in UK Law

  • Hearst Holdings Inc. v AVELA Inc.
    • Chancery Division
    • 25 February 2014
    ...... 177 Conclusion on trade mark infringement in the UK 191 ......
  • Norwich Pharmacal Company v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
    • House of Lords
    • 26 June 1973
    ...... on the 19th of May 1970 in Action 1969 N.230, and in the case of each importation referred to in paragraph 2 of the Particulars of Infringements served by the Appellants on the 5th of August 1970 in Action 1970 N.1809, the name and address of any person appearing from the customs entry in ......
  • Kirin-Amgen v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd
    • House of Lords
    • 21 October 2004
    ...... . 2 These appeals arise out of a dispute concerning both the validity and infringement of the patent between Amgen and two other pharmaceutical companies. Transkaryotic Therapies Inc ("TKT") is a Massachusetts corporation. It has also ......
  • Atherton v British Insulated and Helsby Cables Ltd
    • House of Lords
    • 11 December 1925
    ...... being, comment upon the remarkable fact, that if all this be accepted it must have been known in 1913 when proceedings were taken for infringement, for it may be accepted that the document is badly drawn and it is neither surprising that this House found the patent bad nor that Lord Dunedin ......
  • Aerotel Ltd v Telco Holdings Ltd; Macrossan's Patent Application (No.0314464.9)
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 27 October 2006
    ......The "Aerotel appeal" is in what was a patent action between Aerotel and Telco. Sued for infringement, Telco counterclaimed for revocation of Aerotel's Patent No. 2,171,877. The action started, inappropriately having regard to its complexity and the ......
  • Thomson Holidays Ltd v Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 17 December 2002
    ...... . 4 Norwegian denied infringement; it alleged that the trade marks in so far as they covered certain services including cruises were invalid for five years' non-use. . 5 ......
  • Unilever Plc v Procter and Gamble Company
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 28 October 1999
    ...... view the essential issue is whether or not the manufacture and sale of a product known as Persil Performance Tablets would constitute an infringement of Procter & Gamble's patent. . . 7 Opposition proceedings (initiated by a German company, Henkel) have been taking place in the European ......
  • Roger Maier and Another v ASOS Plc and Another
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 01 April 2015
    ...... headgear and other fashion accessories in the European Union via the internet and under and by reference to the sign ASOS constituted an infringement of the CTM under Article 9(1)(b) and 9(1)(c) of the Regulation and amounted to passing off. It also contended that the UK trade mark was invalid ......
  • Marks and Spencer Plc v Interflora Inc. (A Company Incorporated Under the laws of the State of Michigan, USA) and Another
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 20 November 2012
    ...... Introduction . . 1 This is a case about alleged trade mark infringement. The dispute is between Interflora and Marks & Spencer. Both are household names. The particular question raised on this appeal from Arnold J is ......
  • Hotel Cipriani SRL and Others v Cipriani (Grosvenor Street) Ltd and Others
    • Chancery Division
    • 02 March 2010
    ......CGS denies infringement, passing off and liability under section 56 and counterclaims for a declaration that both the Community trade mark and a United Kingdom trade mark ......
  • See all results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT