Intellectual Property in UK Law
American Cyanamid Company v Ethicon Ltd
...... of the International Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property. . . 24 Certain matters are beyond controversy and may be ......
Reckitt and Colman Products Ltd (t/a Colmans of Norwich) v Borden Inc. and Others
......There is no "property" in the accepted sense of the word in a get-up. Confusion resulting from ......
- R (on the Application of MA (Pakistan) and Others) v Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) and Another
Warnink (Erven) Besloten Vennootschap v J Townend & Sons (Hull) Ltd
...... of which is the subject of passing off actions as being the "property in the business or goodwill likely to be injured by the ......
- Benmax v Austin Motor Company Ltd
- KO (Nigeria) and Others v Secretary of State for theHome Department
Norwich Pharmacal Company v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
...... their rights, and who may be said to have abstracted their property. Their proceedings have come to a deadlock, and it would be a denial of ... The most attractive way to state an acceptable principle, intellectually at least, may be as follows. The dispute between the plaintiff and the ......
Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd and Others (Original Appeal) and Rayner & Keeler Ltd and Others v Courts and Others (Cross Appeal)
...... not only status of persons formerly domiciled in East Germany but property in this country the devolution of which depended on East German law. . ......
Hearst Holdings Inc. v AVELA Inc.
...... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CHANCERY DIVISION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COMMUNITY TRADE MARK COURT Royal Courts of Justice, ......
Biogen Inc. v Medeva Plc
......23. 50 . On the other hand, if he has disclosed a beneficial property which is common to the class, he will be entitled to a patent for all ......
See all results