Land in UK Law
-
Moore v British Waterways Board
... ... They were moored alongside riparian land, which, for the purposes of this action, BWB accepts is in the possession or occupation of the claimant. Unlike the rest of the GUC, that particular ... ...
-
Isle of Anglesey and Others v The Welsh Ministers and Others
... ... , that any rights enjoyed by the fishery interests under the Order are subject to the rights of the claimants to build on the Marina Land, and further that section 7(4) of the 1967 Act does not render it unlawful for it to do so ... 4 Three main issues ... ...
-
The Environment Agency v Paul Barrass and Others
... ... By an agreement dated 9 January 1950 between The Surrey Sand and Gravel Company Limited, the owners of the land in which the marina was constructed, agreed with The Conservators of the River Thames that the cut linking the gravel pit to the river would be a ... ...
-
Isle of Anglesey and Others v The Welsh Ministers and Others
... ... The claimants – subject to obtaining the necessary planning and other statutory consents – wish to see constructed a marina on their land. The proposed marina site would extend to some 10 hectares: of which some 7 hectares would be within the fishery ... 2 ... ...
-
Nigel Peter Moore v British Waterways Board
... ... law riparian rights (including a right to moor) which the Claimant contends he has by virtue of his possession or occupation of (or of part of) land along the GUC near Ridgeways Wharf ... 4 Although some issues have melted away or been restricted by agreement (as I ... ...
-
Holyhead Marina Ltd v Mr Peter Farrer
... ... [T]he Marina may be described as an arrangement of floating pontoons for the mooring of small leisure craft which are linked to the land by a bridge. The pontoons (made of concrete and polystyrene) form the shape of a square (with one side open for access) together with smaller ... ...
-
R Robert Powell v The Brighton Marina Company Ltd and Others Brighton and Hove City Council (Interested Party)
... ... construct the marina and the recreational, residential and other facilities and the road and harbour works described in this Act and to reclaim land from the sea, as by this Act provided:" ... 4 Section 4 is the definitions section. The definitions include the ... ...
-
R Song of The Wild Swan Ltd (Claimant/Appellant) v Environment Agency
... ... 5 Mr Levinson has subsequently obtained from the Land Registry proof that some company of his — it is not entirely clear to me which — owned what has been described as a bottle-shaped area which to ... ...
-
Fowler v Commission for New Towns
... ... In 1980 the government had set up the Merseyside Development Corporation ("MDC") with responsibility for developing reclaimed or derelict land including the area of Liverpool South Docks, an area which was vested in MDC in about 1981. From 1984 onwards a number of meetings took place between ... ...
-
Jones v Mersey River Board
... ... This is a Case Stated by the Lands Tribunal in a reference to them by Mr. Albert Jones who claimed compensation under Section 34 of the Land Drainage Act, 1930. He claimed compensation in respect of farm lands, of which he was the tenant. The farm is known as Orrell Hill Farm, Ince ... ...
See all results