Local Authority in UK Law

Leading Cases
  • Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council and Others
    • House of Lords
    • 24 Ene 1991

    The local authority charged with the administration of local government in a local government area consists of an elected council which A local authority, although democratically elected and representative of the area, is not a sovereign body and can only do such things as are expressly or impliedly authorised by Parliament. Authorised expenditure by a local authority may be short-term or long-term.

    The authorities also show that a power is not incidental merely because it is convenient or desirable or profitable. There are many trading and currency and commercial swap transactions which eliminate or reduce speculation. Individual trading corporations and others may speculate as much as they please or consider prudent. But a local authority is not a trading or currency or commercial operator with no limit on the method or extent of its borrowing or with powers to speculate.

  • Tesco Stores Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment and Others
    • House of Lords
    • 19 Oct 1995

    If there is one principle of planning law more firmly settled than any other, it is that matters of planning judgment are within the exclusive province of the local planning authority or the Secretary of State.

  • South Bucks District Council v Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions and another
    • House of Lords
    • 01 Jul 2004

    They must enable the reader to understand why the matter was decided as it was and what conclusions were reached on the "principal important controversial issues", disclosing how any issue of law or fact was resolved. The reasoning must not give rise to a substantial doubt as to whether the decision-maker erred in law, for example by misunderstanding some relevant policy or some other important matter or by failing to reach a rational decision on relevant grounds.

  • Wandsworth London Borough Council v Winder
    • House of Lords
    • 29 Nov 1984

    He is merely seeking to defend proceedings brought against him by the appellants. In so doing he is seeking only to exercise the ordinary right of any individual to defend an action against him on the ground that he is not liable for the whole sum claimed by the plaintiff. Moreover he puts forward his defence as a matter of right, whereas in an application for judicial review, success would require an exercise of the court's discretion in his favour.

  • R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council
    • House of Lords
    • 27 Feb 2008

    It is impossible to read the words 'a child who is'provided with accommodation by the authority in the exercise of any functions…which are social services functions within the meaning of the Local Authority Social Services Act 1970…' to include a child who has not been drawn to the attention of the local social services authority or provided with any accommodation or other services by that authority.

  • R (Westminster City Council) v National Asylum Support Service
    • House of Lords
    • 17 Oct 2002

    The use of the word "solely" makes it clear that only the able bodied destitute are excluded from the powers and duties of section 21(1)(a). The infirm destitute remain within. Their need for care and attention arises because they are infirm as well as because they are destitute. They would need care and attention even if they were wealthy. They would not of course need accommodation, but that is not where section 21(1A) draws the line.

See all results
Books & Journal Articles
See all results
Law Firm Commentaries
See all results