Offences against the Person in UK Law
- assault and battery
- assault causing harm
- assault occasioning actual bodily harm
- attempted murder
- child abduction
- corporal punishment
- corporate manslaughter
- cyber bullying
- dog attack
- dog bite
- egg shell skull
- false imprisonment
- gross negligence manslaughter
- harassment alarm or distress
- hate crime
- hired killer
- homicide or murder
- involuntary manslaughter
- loss of control
- murder charge
- non fatal offences against the person
- threat to kill
- unlawful detention
R v Hodgson
Where the offence or offences are in themselves grave enough to require a very long sentence. Where it appears from the nature of the offences or from the Defendant's history that he is a person of unstable character likely to commit such offences in the future, and 3. Where if the offences are committed the consequences to others may be specially injurious, as in the case of sexual offences or crimes of violence.
Woolmington v DPP
Throughout the web of the English Criminal Law one golden thread is always to be seen that it is the duty of the prosecution to prove the prisoner's guilt subject to what I have already said as to the defence of insanity and subject also to any statutory exception. No matter what the charge or where the trial, the principle that the prosecution must prove the guilt of the prisoner is part of the common law of England and no attempt to whittle it down can be entertained.
R v Camplin
He should then explain to them that the reasonable man referred to in the question is a person having the power of self-control to be expected of an ordinary person of the sex and age of the accused, but in other respects sharing such of the accused's characteristics as they think would affect the gravity of the provocation to him; and that the question is not merely whether such a person would in like circumstances be provoked to lose his self-control but also would react to the provocation as the accused did.
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody ; R v Same, ex parte Pierson ; R v Same, ex parte Smart ; R v Same, ex parte Pegg
Fairness will very often require that a person who may be adversely affected by the decision will have an opportunity to make representations on his own behalf either before the decision is taken with a view to producing a favourable result: or after it is taken, with a view to procuring its modification; or both.
R v Cooper (Sean)
That means that in cases of this kind the Court must in the end ask itself a subjective question, whether we are content to let the matter stand as it is, or whether there is not some lurking doubt in our minds which makes us wonder whether an injustice has been done. This is a reaction which may not be based strictly on the evidence as such; it is a reaction which can be produced by the general feel of the case as the Court experiences it.
Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire
In some instances the imposition of liability may lead to the exercise of a function being carried on in a detrimentally defensive frame of mind. A great deal of police time, trouble and expense might be expected to have to be put into the preparation of the defence to the action and the attendance of witnesses at the trial. The result would be a significant diversion of police manpower and attention from their most important function, that of the suppression of crime.
R v Merriman
But in answering the question it is important to consider what is meant by a “joint charge”. In my view, it only means that more than one person is being charged and that within certain rules of practice or convenience it is permissible for the two persons to be named in one count. The offences charged in the present case were individual charges against each of the brothers.
Reforming Offences Against the Person
Whilst the criminal law typically favours the principle of correspondence between actus reus and mens rea, the current law governing offences against the person takes an approach which may be more ...
- Codification: Offences against the Person under the Draft Criminal Code
- The Mental Element in Non-Fatal Offences against the Person
- Offences against the Person: Reckless Transmission of HIV
Longer Jail Terms For Those Causing Serious Injury Behind The Wheel
...... From 3 December 2012, any person who causes serious injury to another person by ... bodily harm for the purposes of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861". Whilst case law ......
House Of Lords Inquiry Into Social Media Offences
...... offences under a range of statutes, including the Offences Against the Person Act 1861, the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, the ......
Law Commission Proposes Reforms To Communications Offences To Target Serious Harms From Online Abuse And To Protect Freedom Of Expression
......could be applied where a person deliberately joins a pile-on. intending to cause harm. To complement the ...recommendations to ensure the law is clearer and protects against a. variety of abusive online behaviour:. cyberflashing: the Sexual ......
The Long Arm Of The Law: Extra-Territoriality And The Serious Crime Act 2007
...... of the Serious Crime Act 2007 and the offences of encouraging or assisting an offence. This ... is British: see section 9 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861). 13. The difficulty which ......