Pensions and Retirement in UK Law
-
Humphreys v Revenue and Customs Commissioners
“
It seems clear from Stec, however, that the normally strict test for justification of sex discrimination in the enjoyment of the Convention rights gives way to the "manifestly without reasonable foundation" test in the context of state benefits. The same principles were applied to the sex discrimination involved in denying widow's pensions to men in Runkee v United Kingdom [2007] 2 FCR 178, para 36.
-
R (Carson) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
“
Very many of the expatriate UK pensioners who do not receive uprated pensions have a strong and understandable sense of grievance. They paid their contributions calculated in the same way as pensioners now living here and in, say, the USA, yet they do not receive the same pension. They feel that they have been deprived of an increasingly substantial part of the fruit of their contributions. The real value, at least in the UK, of their pensions is declining from year to year.
-
Parry v Cleaver
“
Is it in reality a form of insurance or is it something quite different? It is generally recognised that pensionable employment is more valuable to a man than the mere amount of his weekly wage. It is more valuable because by reason of the terms of his employment money is being regularly set aside to swell his ultimate pension rights whether on retirement or on disablement. The products of the sums paid into the pension fund are in fact delayed remuneration for his current work.
-
R (Carson) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
“
However, it may be said that this leaves the true relation between questions (iii) and (iv) unresolved. A possible approach, as it seems to me, is to ask a compendious question in place of (iii): are the circumstances of X and Y so similar as to call (in the mind of a rational and fair-minded person) for a positive justification for the less favourable treatment of Y in comparison with X?
In the field of what may be called macro-economic policy, certainly including the distribution of public funds upon retirement pensions, the decision-making power of the elected arms of government is all but at its greatest, and the constraining role of the courts, absent a florid violation by government of established legal principles, is correspondingly modest. I conceive this approach to be wholly in line with our responsibilities under the Human Rights Act 1998.
-
1. The Staff Side of the Police Negotiating Board and Others (First Claimants) v 1. Valerie Piper and Others (Second Claimants) Secretary of State for Work and Defendants Pensions & Hm Treasury & Others
“
Public service pensions, including those for the civil service, police, the NHS and local government, may be increased in accordance with the rules established under the Pensions (Increase) Act 1971. That Act creates a link between public sector pensions and certain state benefits. The effect is that when benefits are increased to take account of the rise in prices that same rate is used to increase public service pensions.
-
Martin-Dye v Martin-Dye
“
Our focus is upon pensions in payment and cash equivalent benefits. For they do not sit comfortably in the category of "property", since they are unrealisable and non-transferable. Nor do they sit comfortably in the category of "income" because, although purely an income stream, the income does not derive from future endeavour but from past employment or contribution which will generally have been effected during the years of marriage.
- Judicial Pensions and Retirement Act 1993
- The Judicial Pensions and Retirement Act 1993 (Addition of Qualifying Judicial Offices) Order 2015
- The Judicial Pensions and Retirement Act 1993 (Part-time Sheriff, Stipendiary Magistrate and Justice of the Peace) Order 2014
- The Judicial Pensions and Retirement Act 1993 (Scottish Land Court) Order 2013
- SEX DISCRIMINATION: RETIREMENT AND PENSIONS
-
“Thatcher’s children”, pensions and retirement ‐ Some survey evidence
Despite major changes in the UK pensions scene, including policy initiatives by successive governments, very little is known about people’s attitudes towards many pensions related issues. Reports t...
-
Accounting for pensions: a revolution in how post-retirement benefits are reported is coming, but there's time for CIMA members to help shape it.
...A radical overhaul of the way we account for pensions seems to be on the way. But it's not just around the corner--in fact, a number of us will be more concerned with collecting our pensions than accounting for them by the time the fundamental change......
-
Can Kenya's NSSF handle new weight? Kenya's National Social Security Fund, set up in the 1960s to provide for pensions and other retirement benefits, has lurched from crisis to crisis. Under new legislation, the pot under its control could amount to $2bn annually. Can this body efficiently manage funds of this scale? Aamera Jiwaji has been finding out.
...The 1st July deadline has come and gone and there is still no clarification on how Kenya's state-run social security fund will manage annual contributions of $2bn. Employers and workers unions are usually pitted against each other, but united by th......