Prohibition of Discrimination in UK Law

Leading Cases
  • Jones v 3M Healthcare Ltd
    • House of Lords
    • 19 Jun 2003

    Dismissal is one of the matters in respect of which discrimination is expressly prohibited by the statutes. Parliament cannot have intended that this prohibition should include an appeal decision regarding dismissal if the appeal is heard before the dismissal takes effect but not if it is heard later. Nor can a sensible distinction be drawn between giving a reference the day before employment ends and giving a reference the day after.

    The preferable approach is to recognise that in each of the relevant statutory provisions the employment relationship is the feature which triggers the employer's obligation not to discriminate in the stated respects. This is the connection between two persons which Parliament has identified as requisite for these purposes. Once triggered, the obligation not to discriminate applies to all the incidents of the employment relationship, whenever precisely they arise.

  • Hall and another v Bull and another
    • Supreme Court
    • 27 Nov 2013

    Regard can also be had to the purpose of the Regulations, not as an aid to construction but in order to understand the problems they were meant to solve and how they proposed to solve them. The purpose was to secure that people of homosexual orientation were treated equally with people of heterosexual orientation by those in the business of supplying goods, facilities and services.

  • Nagarajan v London Regional Transport
    • House of Lords
    • 15 Jul 1999

    Thus, in every case it is necessary to enquire why the complainant received less favourable treatment. Or was it for some other reason, for instance, because the complainant was not so well qualified for the job? Save in obvious cases, answering the crucial question will call for some consideration of the mental processes of the alleged discriminator. Treatment, favourable or unfavourable, is a consequence which follows from a decision.

  • English v Thomas Sanderson Blinds Ltd
    • Court of Appeal
    • 19 Dic 2008

    If, as is common ground, tormenting a man who is believed to be gay but is not amounts to unlawful harassment, the distance from there to tormenting a man who is being treated as if he were gay when he is not is barely perceptible. In both cases the man's sexual orientation, in both cases imaginary, is the basis – that is to say, the ground —of the harassment.

  • Floyd v S (Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening)
    • Court of Appeal
    • 18 Mar 2008

    It was not aimed at protecting them from lawful litigation or at supplying them with a defence to breach of a civil law obligation.

  • Archibald v Fife Council
    • House of Lords
    • 01 Jul 2004

    Treating men more favourably than women discriminates against women. Treating women more favourably than men discriminates against men. The 1995 Act, however, does not regard the differences between disabled people and others as irrelevant. It expects reasonable adjustments to be made to cater for the special needs of disabled people. It necessarily entails an element of more favourable treatment.

See all results
Books & Journal Articles
See all results
Law Firm Commentaries
  • Protection against religious discrimination in the workplace
    • LexBlog United Kingdom
    • Norton Rose Fulbright
    • 16 de Abril de 2013
    The European Court of Human Rights has recently ruled in the cases of four individuals who were unsuccessful in their claims in the UK courts for religious discrimination at work.  All four applica...
    ......, who are practising Christians, brought claims relying on Article 9 (freedom of thought, conscience and religion) and Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination) of the European Convention on Human Rights. They claimed that UK law does not sufficiently protect their rights to freedom of ......
  • Backdating Pension Rights: Restrictions For Civil Partners And Part-Timers Upheld
    • Mondaq UK
    • 5 de Noviembre de 2015
    ...... is because those cases concerned claims of indirect sex discrimination (rather than being directly on the grounds of the claimants' status as ...He also argued that the prohibition of discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation is a fundamental ......
  • Direct Discrimination: Association And Perception
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 4 de Junio de 2010
    ......On the other hand, in relation to sex, marital status, pregnancy, disability* and gender reassignment there is currently no clear prohibition of discrimination based on perception or association. In practice Review all training materials and equality and diversity statements/policies to ......
  • Bereavement Damages Regime Unlawful
    • Mondaq UK
    • 1 de Diciembre de 2017
    ...... (Right to respect for private and family life) and Article 14 (Prohibition of discrimination) of the ECHR, to the extent that it prevents cohabiting ......
See all results