Public Domain in UK Law

Leading Cases
  • EPI Environmental Technologies Inc. and Another v Symphony Plastic Technologies Plc and Another
    • Chancery Division
    • 21 Dezembro 2004

    Relying on Seager, Mr Hobbs QC submits by the provision of the additive itself EPI provided that product in confidence and that product and that provision in that way was confidential private information which Symphony could not use.

    If there is something secret or confidential which they thereby merely copied that would be actionable. However, a thing does not become confidential merely because it is supplied confidentially. Suppose EPI supplied Symphony with a formula for making a very special cake which would be very unique to EPI. A lot of the ingredients would be common ingredients, but it would be contended that the resultant product is arrived at by use of the secret formula.

  • Norbrook Laboratories Ltd v Bomac Laboratories Ltd
    • Privy Council
    • 04 Maio 2006

  • Hilton v Barker Booth & Eastwood (A Firm)
    • House of Lords
    • 03 Fevereiro 2005

    Mr Gibson submitted that a solicitor who has conflicting duties to two clients may not prefer one to another. This may involve performing one duty to the letter of the obligation, and paying compensation for his failure to perform the other. But in any case the fact that he has chosen to put himself in an impossible position does not exonerate him from liability.

  • The Good Law Project v Minister for the Cabinet Office
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • 09 Junho 2021

    The fact that individuals at Public First were known to and had worked with those involved in the decision making, including the Defendant and Mr Cummings, is insufficient to establish apparent bias. Having regard to the specialised nature of the public policy and communications research industry, it is unsurprising that those involved might have developed professional and/or personal friendships over the years working within government departments.

    However, the existence of personal connections between the Defendant, Mr Cummings and the directors of Public First was a relevant circumstance that might be perceived to compromise their impartiality and independence in the context of a public procurement.

  • Fullam v Newcastle Chronicle and Journal Ltd
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 24 Março 1977

    For instance, the facts may be very well known in the area of the newspaper's distribution - in which event I would think it would suffice to plead merely that the plaintiff will rely on inference that some of the newspaper's readers must have been aware of the facts which are said to give rise to the innuendo.

See all results
Legislation
  • The Export Control Order 2008
    • UK Non-devolved
    • 01 de Janeiro de 2008
    ... ... in the public domain ... ...
  • Digital Economy Act 2010
    • UK Non-devolved
    • 01 de Janeiro de 2010
    ... ... copyright and performers' rights; to make provision about internet domain registries; to make provision about the functions of the Channel Four ... ; to amend the Video Recordings Act 1984; to make provision about public lending right in relation to electronic publications; and for connected ... ...
  • The Competition Act 1998 (Vertical Agreements Block Exemption) Order 2022
    • UK Non-devolved
    • 01 de Janeiro de 2022
    ... ... using a domain name corresponding to a geographical area other than the one in which the ... participating in a public procurement exercise undertaken in accordance with— ... ...
  • Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Act 2025
    • Scotland
    • 01 de Janeiro de 2025
    ... ... (2) An investigation is to be conducted in public except to the extent that the Commissioner considers that the taking of ... of disclosure is not, and has not previously been, in the public domain, and ...   (b) the disclosure is not authorised by  subsection (3) ... ...
See all results
Books & Journal Articles
See all results
Law Firm Commentaries
See all results