Registrability in UK Law

Leading Cases
  • Thomson Holidays Ltd v Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 17 déc. 2002

    In my view that task should be carried out so as to limit the specification so that it reflects the circumstances of the particular trade and the way that the public would perceive the use. If the test of infringement is to be applied by the court having adopted the attitude of such a person, then I believe it appropriate that the court should do the same when deciding what is the fair way to describe the use that a proprietor has made of his mark.

  • Angiotech Pharmaceuticals Inc. v Conor Medsystems Inc.
    • House of Lords
    • 09 juil. 2008

    In the Court of Appeal, Jacob LJ dealt comprehensively with the question of when an invention could be considered obvious on the ground that it was obvious to try. He correctly summarised the authorities, starting with the judgment of Diplock LJ in Johns-Manville Corporation's Patent [1967] RPC 479, by saying that the notion of something being obvious to try was useful only in a case in which there was a fair expectation of success.

  • H Young (Operations) Ltd v Medici Ltd
    • Chancery Division
    • 14 juil. 2003

    I do not think there is anything technical about this: the consumer is not expected to think in a pernickety way because the average consumer does not do so. In coming to a fair description the notional average consumer must, I think, be taken to know the purpose of the description. Otherwise they might choose something too narrow or too wide. The whole exercise consists in the end of forming a value judgment as to the appropriate specification having regard to the use which has been made.

  • Compass Publishing BV v Compass Logistics Ltd
    • Chancery Division
    • 24 mar. 2004

    The visual, aural and conceptual similarities of the marks must be assessed by reference to the overall impressions created by the marks bearing in mind their distinctive and dominant components. Furthermore, if the association between the marks causes the public to wrongly believe that the respective goods come from the same or economically linked undertakings, there is a likelihood of confusion.

  • Medimmune Ltd v Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 10 oct. 2012

    Ultimately the court has to evaluate all the relevant circumstances in order to answer a single and relatively simple question of fact: was it obvious to the skilled but unimaginative addressee to make a product or carry out a process falling within the claim. As Aldous LJ said in Norton Healthcare v Beecham Group Plc (unreported, 19 June 1997):

  • Youview TV Ltd v Total Ltd
    • Chancery Division
    • 09 nov. 2012

    I reject Mr Alexander's submission that one should construe database and database programs to "freestanding" ones. Mr Alexander's analogy with the car would only be relevant at all if the specification was limited so as to restrict it to goods where the database program was necessarily sold as a small part of a larger article. The specification in issue here does not have that effect.

  • Designer Guild Ltd v Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd (trading as Washington DC)
    • House of Lords
    • 23 nov. 2000

    The purpose of the examination is not to see whether the overall appearance of the two designs is similar, but to judge whether the particular similarities relied on are sufficiently close, numerous or extensive to be more likely to be the result of copying than of coincidence. It is at this stage that similarities may be disregarded because they are commonplace, unoriginal, or consist of general ideas.

See all results
Legislation
See all results
Books & Journal Articles
  • Shaving the Trade Marks Directive Down to Size?
    • Num. 63-4, July 2000
    • The Modern Law Review
    ...... of the exceptions, together with the question of the extent to which policy concerns should be built into other parts of the test of registrability. 13 In the United Kingdom these issues were recently addressed by the Court of Appeal in Philips Electronics NV v Remington Consumer Products Ltd. ......
  • Lords Design Constraints
    • Num. 59-3, May 1996
    • The Modern Law Review
    ...... to parts of an article which ‘must match’ another article.6 The introduction of these restrictions upon registrability reflects a belief that problems exist in relation to complex products which do not correspond to the image of the commodity ......
  • The Land Registration Act 2002 – the Show on the Road
    • Num. 77-5, September 2014
    • The Modern Law Review
    This article reviews the Land Registration Act 2002, taking advantage of the deeper perspective afforded by the intervening decade, and absorbing subsequent developments – and, in the case of the A...
    ...... property interests arising in such ways at all, rather than solely in ways where the acquirer will know of the interest and of its registrability, or certainly can be advised about these things. But the wider position, having been 58 [2011] UKSC 53; [2012] 1 AC 776. 59 A belief in a precise ......
  • Cross‐border asset protection: an offshore perspective
    • Num. 10-3, July 2003
    • Journal of Financial Crime
    • 229-245
    Considers the ability of an applicant to reach assets in offshore jurisdictions, showing that there is a difference between the offshore world and the rest of the world; most of the “traditional” o...
    ......Recognition and enforcement are two dierent beasts, and if local courts recognised and accepted such registrability, they would become fully appraised of the basis for, and terms of the order aecting assets within their jurisdiction. Once registered, there will ......
See all results
Law Firm Commentaries
  • Protection Of Colour Combination Marks
    • Mondaq UK
    ......Subject to any appeal by Red Bull to the CJEU, the decision was a blow for brand owners, setting the test for registrability of two-colour marks very high. Indeed, the effect of the decision seems to be that colour marks comprising colour combinations are harder to register ......
  • Descriptive Trade Marks - Round 2
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    ...... public have to make some mental activity to work out whether the mark refers to the quality of the goods, this may assist the mark's registrability. It would also help in registrability if members of the public are uncertain as to the nature of the reference to the quality or the character of the ......
  • Death By A Thousand Cuts? Court Of Appeal Refers Trade Mark Dilution Questions To ECJ
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    ...... of Patten J on 26 July 2006 (which in turn was an appeal from a Trade Marks Registry decision of Mr Reynolds) on the issue of the registrability of word mark 'Intelmark', registered in class 35 for "marketing and telemarketing services." . The High Court held that Intel has a huge reputation ......
  • SLOGANS: Can They Be Registered As Trade Marks?
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    ......The European Court of Justice (ECJ) recently ruled on the registrability of slogans as trade marks in Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market v Erpo Möbelwerk GmbH (Case C-64/02). The case is the latest in a line ......
See all results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT