Registrability in UK Law

Leading Cases
  • Thomson Holidays Ltd v Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd
    • Court of Appeal
    • 17 Dic 2002

    In my view that task should be carried out so as to limit the specification so that it reflects the circumstances of the particular trade and the way that the public would perceive the use. If the test of infringement is to be applied by the court having adopted the attitude of such a person, then I believe it appropriate that the court should do the same when deciding what is the fair way to describe the use that a proprietor has made of his mark.

  • Angiotech Pharmaceuticals Inc. v Conor Medsystems Inc.
    • House of Lords
    • 09 Jul 2008

    In the Court of Appeal, Jacob LJ dealt comprehensively with the question of when an invention could be considered obvious on the ground that it was obvious to try. He correctly summarised the authorities, starting with the judgment of Diplock LJ in Johns-Manville Corporation's Patent [1967] RPC 479, by saying that the notion of something being obvious to try was useful only in a case in which there was a fair expectation of success.

  • H Young (Operations) Ltd v Medici Ltd
    • Chancery Division
    • 14 Jul 2003

    I do not think there is anything technical about this: the consumer is not expected to think in a pernickety way because the average consumer does not do so. In coming to a fair description the notional average consumer must, I think, be taken to know the purpose of the description. Otherwise they might choose something too narrow or too wide. The whole exercise consists in the end of forming a value judgment as to the appropriate specification having regard to the use which has been made.

  • Compass Publishing BV v Compass Logistics Ltd
    • Chancery Division
    • 24 Mar 2004

    The visual, aural and conceptual similarities of the marks must be assessed by reference to the overall impressions created by the marks bearing in mind their distinctive and dominant components. Furthermore, if the association between the marks causes the public to wrongly believe that the respective goods come from the same or economically linked undertakings, there is a likelihood of confusion.

  • Medimmune Ltd v Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd
    • Court of Appeal
    • 10 Oct 2012

    Ultimately the court has to evaluate all the relevant circumstances in order to answer a single and relatively simple question of fact: was it obvious to the skilled but unimaginative addressee to make a product or carry out a process falling within the claim. As Aldous LJ said in Norton Healthcare v Beecham Group Plc (unreported, 19 June 1997):

  • Youview TV Ltd v Total Ltd
    • Chancery Division
    • 09 Nov 2012

    I reject Mr Alexander's submission that one should construe database and database programs to "freestanding" ones. Mr Alexander's analogy with the car would only be relevant at all if the specification was limited so as to restrict it to goods where the database program was necessarily sold as a small part of a larger article. The specification in issue here does not have that effect.

  • Designer Guild Ltd v Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd (trading as Washington DC)
    • House of Lords
    • 23 Nov 2000

    The purpose of the examination is not to see whether the overall appearance of the two designs is similar, but to judge whether the particular similarities relied on are sufficiently close, numerous or extensive to be more likely to be the result of copying than of coincidence. It is at this stage that similarities may be disregarded because they are commonplace, unoriginal, or consist of general ideas.

See all results
Books & Journal Articles
See all results
Law Firm Commentaries
  • Protection Of Colour Combination Marks
    • Mondaq UK
    • 12 de Abril de 2018
    ......Subject to any appeal by Red Bull to the CJEU, the decision was a blow for brand owners, setting the test for registrability of two-colour marks very high. Indeed, the effect of the decision seems to be that colour marks comprising colour combinations are harder to register ......
  • Descriptive Trade Marks - Round 2
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 22 de Mayo de 2002
    ...... public have to make some mental activity to work out whether the mark refers to the quality of the goods, this may assist the mark's registrability. It would also help in registrability if members of the public are uncertain as to the nature of the reference to the quality or the character of the ......
  • Death By A Thousand Cuts? Court Of Appeal Refers Trade Mark Dilution Questions To ECJ
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 24 de Julio de 2007
    ...... of Patten J on 26 July 2006 (which in turn was an appeal from a Trade Marks Registry decision of Mr Reynolds) on the issue of the registrability of word mark 'Intelmark', registered in class 35 for "marketing and telemarketing services." . The High Court held that Intel has a huge reputation ......
  • SLOGANS: Can They Be Registered As Trade Marks?
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 12 de Enero de 2005
    ......The European Court of Justice (ECJ) recently ruled on the registrability of slogans as trade marks in Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market v Erpo Möbelwerk GmbH (Case C-64/02). The case is the latest in a line ......
See all results