Shipment of Oil in UK Law

  • The Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992
    • No. 56-2, March 1993
    • The Modern Law Review
    • 0000
    ... ... is made, and (iii) the goods are lost.8 Under standard international sales contracts the buyer bears risk of loss from the time of shipment, but although he may have transferred to him a document of title representing the goods and, as a result, have constructive possession or ... ...
  • Controlling Policy by Controlling Process: Judicial Influence on Regulatory Decision Making
    • No. 14-1, 1998
    • The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization
    • 114-135
    ... ... and reasonable" rate of return regulation in order to prevent outrageously high ... charges for the shipment of oil by Standard.18 ... Standard, an integrated oil ... company, had a virtual monopoly on pipelines and allegedly charged small ... independent ... ...
  • Institutional Trends in Russia’s Oil and Gas Sectors
    • No. 6-3, 2013
    • The Journal of World Energy Law & Business
    • 163-178
    ... ... of post-command economy hydrocarbons: strong State influence, top-down market design, dependency on complex pipeline infrastructure for shipment of commodities, high energy intensity and a significant dependency on export revenues. The distinction between the institutional dynamics of the two ... ...
  • A Polar Mediterranean? Accessibility, Resources and Sovereignty in the Arctic Ocean
    • No. 1-3, October 2010
    • Global Policy
    • 0000
    The Arctic Ocean has been described as undergoing a fundamental ‘state change’– with particular reference to the loss of sea ice. Recent events suggest that the five coastal states (Canada, Denmark...
    ... ... shipment of oil and other related products.Supported by the world’s largest icebreaker fleet of 28 ves-sels, oil-related traffic transits the Barents Sea ... ...
  • The Case for Decoupled Armed Interventions
    • No. 3-1, February 2012
    • Global Policy
    • 0000
    This article suggests that if the humanitarian goals of armed interventions are decoupled from coerced regime change and nation building, they can be carried out effectively and at rather low costs...
    ... ... As President Obama pointed out, if US vital inter-ests are directly affected—say, a foreign power isblocking the shipment of oil through the Strait of Hor-muz—the US will act, based on interest considerationsand not necessarily what other nations consider the ... ...
  • Chapter 8: Bills of lading in documentary credits
    • Bills of Lading
    • Taylor and Francis
    • 235-254
    ... ... named vessel at the port of loading stated in the credit, whether by prior printed wording or an “on board notation indicating the date of shipment”; ... 6 ... ...
  • Margin to mainstream, periphery to center
    • No. 3-3, September 2018
    • Asian Journal of Comparative Politics
    • 0000
    Once one of the most remote and forgotten regions in the world, the rugged upland of Myanmar, between China and India, is moving from periphery to center. Both resource rich and strategically criti...
    ... ... The shipment of oil and gas needs to go through the Malacca Straits, which is largely controlled by the USand US allies.266 Asian Journal of Comparative Politics ... ...
  • Suez Crisis Frustrates C.I.F. Contract
    • No. 22-1, January 1959
    • The Modern Law Review
    • 0000
    Carapanayoti & Co., LTD. V. E. T. Green, LTD.,1 concerns a c.i.f. contract affected by the blocking of the Suez Canal in November, 1956. In September of that year, the plaintiffs bought from the de...
    ... ... of that year, the plaintiffs bought from the defendants 100 tons of Sudanese semi-decorticated expeller cotton seed cake for shipment from Port Sudan in October or November to Belfast, and the defendants made a covering purchase from Sudan Oil Mills, Ltd., of ... ...
  • Chapter 7: The Cargo
    • Bills of Lading
    • Taylor and Francis
    • 205-248
    ... ... 7B: Shipment and Receipt ... 7.4 ... ...
  • Pearl Harbor: Deterrence Theory and Decision Theory
    • No. 4-2, June 1967
    • Journal of Peace Research
    • 0000
    According to most analyses, Japan's decision to attack the United States at Pearl Harbor in 1941 can only be explained as an act of irrationality, given the difference in relative power of the two ...
    ... ... -material scarce Japan was obvious.Following the freeze on Japanese assets inthe United States of July 1941, and theconsequent cessation of shipment of oil,scrap-iron, and other goods from theUnited States, Japan’s economy was inmost severe straits and her power to wagewar directly threatened ... ...
  • See all results