Terrorism in UK Law
-
Secretary of State for the Home Department v MB [House of Lords
... ... 2006 Sullivan J held that obligations imposed on the respondents in control orders made by the Secretary of State under the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 deprived the respondents of their liberty in breach of article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights and that the orders should be ... ...
-
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3)
... ... Each control order was made pursuant to section 2 of the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 ("the PTA") on the ground that the Secretary of State had reasonable grounds for suspecting that the appellant was, or had been, involved in ... ...
-
A v HM Treasury (Nos 1 &2)
... ... in these proceedings as "G", was informed that a direction had been made against him by HM Treasury ("the Treasury") under article 4 of the Terrorism (United Nations Measures) Order 2006 (SI 2006/2657) ("the TO") and that he was a designated person for the purposes of that Order. He was told that ... ...
-
Lucas-Box v News Group Newspapers Ltd
... ... various grave criminal offences, not excluding even multiple murder, just as Rose Dugdale had assisted Eddie Gallagher to commit acts of terrorism, as Ulrike Meinhof had organised murders with Andreas Baader, as Patricia Ford had helped Alan Reeve to escape from prison, as the women of the ... ...
-
R (Gillan) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis and Another; R (Quinton) v Same
... ... There are, and have for some years been, statutory exceptions to it. These appeals concern an exception now found in sections 44-47 of the Terrorism Act 2000 ("the 2000 Act"). The appellants challenge the use made of these sections and, in the last resort, the sections themselves. Since any ... ...
-
R (Raissi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
... ... 2 On 21 September 2001, the appellant, who was then 27 years old, was arrested at his home under the Terrorism Act 2000 on suspicion of having been concerned with the World Trade Centre atrocity (“9/11”) ten days earlier. Following questioning, he was ... ...
-
R v Maxwell (Note)
... ... on the part of the appellant was to the effect that since at the time of the commission of the offence there was no generalised offence of terrorism as such the state of ignorance which must be assumed in favour of the accused as to the precise weapon (e.g. bomb, bullets, or incendiary device) or ... ...
-
Ruiz and Others v Central Court of Criminal Proceedings No 5 of the National Court, Madrid
... ... the return of all three appellants to Spain for the purpose of standing trial for offences of membership of a criminal organisation and terrorism. On 26 April, the Serious and Organised Crime Agency ("SOCA") certified the three EAWs in accordance with section 2(7) of the 2003 Act. On the ... ...
-
R (Youssef) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs
... ... proceedings, dating from 3 December 2010, he simply rejected (without further explanation) the notion that he is "in any way involved in terrorism, or … linked in any way to Al-Qaida or the Taliban". The court was told that he intends to challenge the Secretary of State's recent decision not ... ...
-
YM (Uganda) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
... ... He was arrested in September 2006 and charged on two counts of offences under section 8(2)(a) of the Terrorism Act 2006. Broadly speaking this sub-section makes it an offence for anyone to attend a place, in the UK or elsewhere, where he has instruction or ... ...
See all results