Prohibition (Phone-Paid Services Authority)

This case was brought against an associated individual under paragraph 5.8.12 of the 15th edition of the Code of Practice.The Tribunal was asked to consider imposing a prohibition against Mr Adrian Smith pursuant to paragraph 5.8.5(g) of the Code.The case related to a previous adjudication against Moblix Media Limited, the merchant provider (case reference: 189274). The case involved a...

This case was brought against an associated individual under paragraph 5.8.12 of the 15th edition of the Code of Practice.The Tribunal was asked to consider imposing a prohibition against Mr Ben Dewhurst pursuant to paragraph 5.8.5(g) of the Code.The case related to a previous adjudication against Connect You Limited (the “Merchant provider”) (case reference 188306). The case related to an...

This case was brought against the associated individual under paragraph 5.8.12 of the 15th edition of the Code of Practice. The Tribunal was asked to consider imposing a prohibition against Mr Ian Conway pursuant to paragraph 5.8.5(g) of the Code.The case related to a previous adjudication against Numbers Plus Ltd, the Network operator (case reference 179345). The previous adjudication concerned...

This case was brought against Connect You Limited (“the Merchant”) under Paragraph 5.4 of the 15th Edition of the Code of Practice (“Code 15”).It concerns an Information, Connection and Signposting Service (“ICSS”) provided by the Merchant (“the Service”). The Service was a Type 1 ICSS which connects consumers to 29 different organisations, including HMRC, DVLA, British Gas, O2 and Apple. The...

This case was brought against the associated individual under paragraph 5.8.12 of the 15th edition of the Code of Practice.The Tribunal was asked to consider imposing a prohibition against Mr Matthew Penny pursuant to paragraph 5.8.5(g) of the Code.The case related to a previous adjudication against Embill Services Limited (case reference: 187522). The previous adjudication involved a sexual...

This case was brought against the associated individual under paragraph 5.8.12 of the 15th edition of the Code of Practice (“the Code”).The tribunal (‘the Tribunal’) has been asked to consider imposing a prohibition against Mr Darren Hodes, pursuant to paragraph 5.8.5(g) of the Code.The case related to a previous adjudication against TCS Combined Solutions Limited (the “Merchant”) (case reference

This case was brought against the associated individual under paragraph 5.8.12 of the 15th edition of the Code of Practice (“the Code”).The tribunal (‘the Tribunal’) has been asked to consider imposing a prohibition against Mr Darren Hodes, pursuant to paragraph 5.8.5(g) of the Code.The case related to a previous adjudication against TCS Combined Solutions Limited (the “Merchant”) (case reference

This case was brought against the associated individual under paragraph 4.8.8 of the 14th edition of the Code of Practice (‘the Code’).The Tribunal was asked to consider imposing a prohibition against Mr Stoyancho Mitev pursuant to paragraph 4.8.3(g) of the Code.The case related to an adjudication against the Level 2 provider, Webdata Ltd, (‘the Level 2 provider’), which was heard on 11 October 20

This case was brought against the associated individual under paragraph 4.8.8 of the 14th edition of the Code of Practice (“the Code”).The case related to an adjudication against the Level 2 provider, Webdata Ltd, (‘the Level 2 provider’), which was heard on 11 October 2019 (case reference: 154913). The adjudication concerned a subscription-based alert service, ‘Lotto Alerts’ (‘the Service’)...

The Tribunal was asked to consider imposing a prohibition against Mr Ravi Kumar Metta pursuant to paragraph 4.8.3(g) of the Code.The case related to an adjudication against the Level 2 provider, Itech Logic Ltd, (‘the Level 2 provider’), which was heard on 25 and 30 March 2020 (case reference: 165797). The adjudication against Itech Logic Ltd concerned a quiz competition service which operated...

The Tribunal was asked to consider imposing a prohibition against Mr Ofir Sarusy pursuant to paragraph 4.8.3(g) of the 14th edition of the Phone-paid Services Authority (“PSA”) Code of Practice (the “Code”).The case related to two previous adjudications against the Level 2 provider, Tobaji Ltd. The first adjudication which was dated 13 September 2018 (case reference: 130464) involved a call-connec

The Tribunal was asked to consider imposing a prohibition against Mr Leon Wander pursuant to paragraph 4.8.3(g) of the 14th edition of the Phone-paid Services Authority (“PSA”) Code of Practice (the “Code”).The case related to an adjudication against the Level 2 provider, IT Zone Limited. This adjudication took place on 11 October 2019 (case reference: 154674). The adjudication involved a...

This case was brought against the Level 2 provider under Paragraph 4.8.6 of the 14th edition of the Code of Practice (“the Code”).The Tribunal was asked to consider imposing a prohibition against Mr Peter Lyons pursuant to paragraph 4.8.3(g) of the Code.The case related to two previous adjudications against the Level 2 provider, PowerTel Limited, ‘the Level 2 provider’, one dated 18 September 2018