Business Law in UK Law
-
Attorney General of Belize and Others v Belize Telecom and another
... ... the parties as reasonable men if it had been suggested to them: it must have been a term that went without saying, a term necessary to give business efficacy to the contract, a term which, though tacit, formed part of the contract which the parties made for themselves." ... ...
-
OBG Ltd and another v Allan and Others
... ... OK! says that this was interference by unlawful means with its contractual or business relations or a breach of its equitable right to confidentiality in photographic images of the wedding. (c) In Mainstream ... ...
-
Adams v Cape Industries Plc
... ... (This is the company whose office in Chicago is said by the plaintiffs to have been the place of business in the USA at which, until May 1978, Cape and Capasco were present.) The shares in NAAC were held by Cape. The function of NAAC was to assist in the ... ...
-
Rookes v Barnard
... ... on the ground only that it induces some other person to break a contract of employment or that it is an interference with the trade, business or employment of some other person, or with the right of some other person to dispose of his capital or his labour as he wills." ... ...
-
Dubai Aluminium Company Ltd v Salaam
... ... Section 10 provides: 'Where, by any wrongful act or omission of any partner acting in the ordinary course of the business of the firm, or with the authority of his co-partners, loss or injury is caused to any person not being a partner in the firm, or any penalty is ... ...
-
Royal Bank of Scotland Plc v Etridge (No 2); Kenyon-Brown v Desmond Banks & Company (Undue Influence) (No 2); Bank of Scotland v Bennett; UCB Home Loans Corporation Ltd v Moore; National Westminster Bank Plc v Gill; Midland Bank Plc v Wallace; Barclays Bank Plc v Harris; Barclays Bank Plc v Coleman
... ... in her home in favour of a bank as security for her husband's indebtedness or the indebtedness of a company through which he carried on business. The wife later asserted she signed the charge under the undue influence of her husband. In Barclays Bank Plc v O'Brien [1994] 1 AC 180 your ... ...
-
Freeman & Lockyer (A Firm)(Plaintiffs) Buckhurst Park Properties (Mangal) Ltd and Shiv Kumar Kapoor (Defendants)
... ... LORD JUSTICE WILLMER ... 1 The plaintiffs, who carry on business as architects and surveyors, bring this action to recover fees alleged to be due to them in respect of work done during the autumn of 1959 in ... ...
-
Rainy Sky SA and Others v Kookmin Bank
... ... Following such refund the Builder may, but shall not be obliged to, by notice in writing to the Buyer given within ten (10) business days terminate this contract. If the Builder does not so terminate the Contract the Buyer's obligation to pay further installments prior to delivery ... ...
-
Morris-Garner and another v One Step (Support) Ltd
... ... 6 The relevant events can be summarised as follows. In 1999 the first defendant established a business providing support for young people leaving care. In 2002 she agreed to sell a 50% interest to a Mr and Mrs Costelloe. The claimant company, One Step ... ...
-
Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd
... ... He is entitled to a share in the profits while the company continues to carry on business and a share in the distribution of the surplus assets when the company is wound up." ... In Lonrho Ltd v Shell Petroleum Co Ltd [1980] 1 ... ...
See all results