Compulsory Purchase in UK Law

Leading Cases
  • Smith v East Elloe Rural District Council
    • House of Lords
    • 26 Mar 1956

    But this argument is in reality a play on the meaning of the word nullity. An Order, even if not made in good faith, is still an act capable of legal consequences. Unless the necessary proceedings are taken at law to establish the cause of invalidity and to get it quashed or otherwise upset it will remain as effective for its ostensible purpose as the most impeccable of Orders.

  • Sovmots Investments Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment; Brompton Securities Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 09 Jul 1976

    (3) Although no question of common intention arises, one must construe the compulsory purchase order and ascertain the intention of the acquiring authority. Camden must have intended to acquire the rights here in question, without which it would be impossible for the maisonettes to be used as houses.

  • Woolfson v Strathclyde Regional Council
    • House of Lords
    • 15 Feb 1978

    I have some doubts whether in this respect the Court of Appeal properly applied the principle that it is appropriate to pierce the corporate veil only where special circumstances exist indicating that is a mere facade concealing the true facts. Woolfson cannot be treated as beneficially entitled to the whole share-holding in Campbell, since it is not found that the one share in Campbell held by his wife is held as his nominee.

  • Grampian Regional Council v Secretary of State for Scotland
    • House of Lords
    • 24 Nov 1983

    The sole purpose of the certification procedure is to provide a basis for determining the development value, if any, to be taken into account in assessing the compensation payable on compulsory acquisition.

  • Waters and Others v Welsh Development Agency
    • House of Lords
    • 29 Abr 2004

    Parliament cannot have intended that the acquiring authority should pay as compensation a larger amount than the owner could reasonably have obtained for his land in the absence of the power. For the same reason there should also be disregarded the 'special want' of an acquiring authority for a particular site which arises from the authority having been authorised to acquire it.

    Drawing a distinction between value to the owner and value to the purchaser makes it necessary to distinguish the one from the other. What is relevant, because this may affect the value of the land, is the use the acquiring authority proposes to make of the land it is acquiring. Accordingly, in identifying any enhanced value which must be disregarded it is always necessary to look beyond the mere existence of the power of compulsory purchase.

  • Fairmount Investments Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment
    • House of Lords
    • 24 Jun 1976

    But in this case I am unable, consonant with the essential principles of fairness in a dispute, to uphold this compulsory purchase order. All cases in which principles of natural justice are invoked must depend on the particular circumstances of the cases. I can only say that in my opinion, in the circumstances I have outline, Fairmount has not had—in a phrase whose derivation neither I nor your Lordships could trace—a fair crack of the whip.

See all results
Legislation
See all results
Books & Journal Articles
  • Compulsory purchase
    • Núm. 32-5, Julio 2014
    • Journal of Property Investment & Finance
    • 518-529
    Purpose: – The purpose of this paper is to review the economic theories that lie behind the assessment of compulsory purchase compensation and the issues that arise from them. Design/methodology/a...
  • Compulsory purchase and compensation update – 2015
    • Núm. 33-6, Septiembre 2015
    • Journal of Property Investment & Finance
    • 586-593
    Purpose: – The purpose of this paper is to provide a summary and analysis of recent legal decisions relating to compensation for compulsory purchase. Design/methodology/approach: – The paper summa...
  • Compulsory purchase and compensation update – 2016
    • Núm. 34-4, Julio 2016
    • Journal of Property Investment & Finance
    • 421-427
    Purpose: – The purpose of this paper is to summarise and analyse reforms to the compulsory purchase compensation code which have been published for consultation by the Department for Communities an...
  • Compulsory purchase and compensation update – 2013
    • Núm. 31-6, Septiembre 2013
    • Journal of Property Investment & Finance
    • 602-609
    Purpose: Annual update on caselaw relating to compulsory purchase and compensation. This paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach: Research of decisions made by the Court of...
See all results
Law Firm Commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT