Criminal Negligence in UK Law
-
R v Church
“
For such a verdict inexorably to follow, the unlawful act must be such as all sober and reasonable people would inevitably recognise must subject the other person to, at least, the risk of some harm resulting therefrom, albeit not serious harm.
-
R v Misra (Amit)
“
On proper analysis, therefore, the jury is not deciding whether the particular defendant ought to be convicted on some unprincipled basis. The question for the jury is not whether the defendant's negligence was gross, and whether, additionally, it was a crime, but whether his behaviour was grossly negligent and consequently criminal. This is not a question of law, but one of fact, for decision in the individual case.
-
Daniel McCracken (a protected party suing by his mother and litigation friend Deborah Norris) (Claimant/1st Respondent) v (1) Damian Smith (1st Defendant/2nd Respondent) (2) The Motor Insurers' Bureau (2nd Defendant/3rd Respondent) (3) Darren Michael Bell (3rd Defendant/Appellant)
“
I do not think that the fact that the criminal conduct was one of the two causes is a sufficient basis for the ex turpi causa defence to succeed. Our attention has not been drawn to any remotely comparable case where it has in fact succeeded: for reasons I have explained, cases involving a claim by one party to a criminal joint enterprise against another party to that joint enterprise are materially different.
-
R (Takoushis) v HM Coroner for Inner North London and Others
“
-
Tesco Supermarkets Ltd v Nattrass
“
A living person has a mind which can have knowledge or intention or be negligent and he has hands to carry out his intentions. A corporation has none of these: it must act through living persons, though not always one or the same person. Then the person who acts is not speaking or acting for the company. He is acting as the company and his mind which directs his acts is the mind of the company. If it is a guilty mind then that guilt is the guilt of the company.
-
R v North Humberside and Scunthorpe Coroner, ex parte Jamieson
“
-
Jimmie William Frederick Hornal v Neuberger Products Ltd
“
-
Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015
... ... (4) A “relevant duty of care” means—(a) a duty owed under the law of negligence, or(b) a duty that would be owed under the law of negligence but for a provision contained in an Act, or an instrument made under an Act, under which ... ...
- Consumer Rights Act 2015
-
Coronavirus Act 2020
... ... 53: Expansion of availability of live links in criminal proceedings ... ...
-
Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
... ... for confiscation orders in relation to persons who benefit from criminal conduct and for restraint orders to prohibit dealing with property, to ... action, except so far as the loss or damage is caused by his negligence ... (2) Subsection (3) applies if an administrator incurs expenses in ... ...
- Medical Manslaughter: The Effect of Lay Findings of (Criminal) Gross Negligence on Professional Tribunals
- Findlay Stark, Culpable Carelessness: Recklessness and Negligence in the Criminal Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016, 327 pp, hb £72.99.
-
The Legal Response to Work-Related Fatalities in NSW in 1984*
This article is a study of the response of the legal/regulatory system to all 129 work-related fatalities which occurred in NSW in 1984. Previous research on the response of the legal system has ut...... ... many quarters for the employers to beprosecuted for some form of criminal negligence forthedeath of their employees,coroners inourstudy would ... ...
-
Gross Negligence Manslaughter on the Cusp
Despite playing a significant role in defining the boundaries of manslaughter, the ‘gross negligence’ concept is notoriously indeterminate. There is no comprehensible and consistent means of measur...... ... There is no comprehensible and consistent means of measuringwhether conduct is sufficiently gross to warrant criminal conviction. The gross negligence conditionalso sets the culpability bar too low by permitting the criminal censure of undeserving defendants whodid ... ...
- Crime Doesn't Pay Criminal Enterprise And Negligence
- Crime Doesn't Pay Criminal Enterprise And Negligence
-
Meritas Guide: To Defective Products Litigation in EMEA - England
1. What claims may be brought for liability for defective products? Is liability based on fault/ negligence, or strict liability, or both? Defective product claims may be brought in contract, t...... ... liability based on fault/ ... negligence, or strict ... liability, or both? ... Defective product ... products may additionally face criminal ... liability if their product is defective, ... under the ... ...
-
Corporate Manslaughter And Corporate Homicide Act 2007
... ... are not being held sufficiently accountable for deaths caused by "criminal" negligence ... The Old Law ... Previously, it was only possible to ... ...
-
Claim to grant bail (criminal proceedings) (sched.1- RSC O.79 r.9(1))
King's Bench forms for use in cases such as personal injury, negligence and breach of contract.
-
Form COP44A
Court of Protection forms including the COP1 application to make decisions on someone's behalf.... ... • unfair dismissal awards ... • money from the criminal injury compensation scheme ... • medical negligence or personal injury ... ...