Cross Examination in UK Law
-
Powell v Streatham Manor Nursing Home
“
-
Wenlock v Moloney
“
-
Speidel v Plato Films Ltd
“
-
Gestmin SGPS S.A. v Credit Suisse (UK) Ltd and Another
“
Above all, it is important to avoid the fallacy of supposing that, because a witness has confidence in his or her recollection and is honest, evidence based on that recollection provides any reliable guide to the truth.
-
R v Selvey
“
-
Maxwell v DPP
“
It is of the utmost importance for a fair trial that the evidence should be prima facie limited to matters relating to the transaction which forms the subject of the indictment and that any departure from these matters should be strictly confined.
-
Stirland v DPP
“
A perverse jury might conceivably announce a verdict of acquittal in the teeth of all the evidence; but the provision that the Court of Criminal Appeal may dismiss the appeal if they consider that no substantial miscarriage of justice has actually occurred in convicting the accused assumes a situation where a reasonable jury, after being properly directed, would, on the evidence properly admissible, without doubt convict.
- The Prohibition of Cross-Examination in Person (Civil and Family Proceedings) Regulations 2022
- The Prohibition of Cross-Examination in Person (Fees of Court-Appointed Qualified Legal Representatives) (Amendment) Regulations 2024
- The Prohibition of Cross-Examination in Person (Fees of Court-Appointed Qualified Legal Representatives) Regulations 2022
- The Criminal Procedure Rules 2015
- Cross-Examination
-
The Trial of Andrei Sawoniuk: Holocaust Testimony under Cross-Examination
Andrei Sawoniuk, a member of a Nazi-organized police outfit, led an operation in a small town in Belorus in 1942-3 to kill the Jews who had evaded the main Nazi massacre. He was found guilty, not o...
- Cross-Examination of Vulnerable Witnesses—Towards a Blueprint for Re-Professionalisation
-
The Right to Cross-Examination and Witness Protection in Ethiopia: Comparative Overview
Cross-examination particularly in the context of criminal trial is a human right recognized in international human rights law and the Ethiopian constitution. However, states are increasingly facing...
-
How much can a judge intervene in cross-examination before a trial becomes unfair?
Lord Justice Jackson's reforms to the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) enabled judges to take a more active part in case management: they can manage the parties' costs budgets, control the timetable, l...
- 12 Hearings Announced As IPC To Allow Cross-Examination
- 12 Hearings Announced As IPC To Allow Cross-Examination
-
How much can a judge intervene in cross-examination before a trial becomes unfair?
A TCC decision looks set to shake up the construction industry's approach to concurrent delay and how to draft extension of time clauses. What's more, the decision is so forthright and clear that i...
-
28)
Criminal Case Management forms including hearing forms.... ... to represent the defendant at the Ground Rules Hearing, the S.28 cross examination(s) and the trial ... ... ...
-
28)
Criminal Case Management forms including hearing forms.... ... at the Ground Rules Hearing, the S.28 cross examination(s) and the trial ... I confirm that I have read the ... ...
-
28)
Criminal Case Management forms including hearing forms.... ... been warned that if he/she is on bail and fails to attend, the S.28 cross examination, and/or the trial the proceedings may continue in his/her ... ...
-
Order for appointment of special examiner to take evidence of witness out of jurisdiction (rule 34.13(4) and PD34A para 5.8)
King's Bench forms for use in cases such as personal injury, negligence and breach of contract.... ... 34.13(4) as special examiner for the purpose of taking the examination, cross-examination and re-examination orally, on oath or affirmation, of ... ...