Crown Court in UK Law
-
R v Manchester Crown Court, ex parte DPP
“
It may therefore be a helpful further pointer to the true construction of the section to ask the question, "Is the decision sought to be reviewed one arising in the issue between the Crown and the defendant formulated by the indictment (including the costs of such issue)?" It may therefore be a helpful further pointer to the true construction of the section to ask the question, "Is the decision sought to be reviewed one arising in the issue between the Crown and the defendant formulated by the indictment (including the costs of such issue)?"
-
R (McCann) v Manchester Crown Court
“
However, I agree that, given the seriousness of matters involved, at least some reference to the heightened civil standard would usually be necessary: In re H (Minors)(Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof) [1996] AC 563, 586D-H, per Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead. But in my view pragmatism dictates that the task of magistrates should be made more straightforward by ruling that they must in all cases under section 1 apply the criminal standard.
-
R v Harrow Crown Court, ex parte Dave
“
The Crown Court Judge giving the decision of the Court upon an appeal must say enough to demonstrate that the Court has identified the main contentious issues in the case and how it has resolved each of them.
-
R v Ashton; R v Draz; R v O'Reilly
“
If the answer to that question is no, then the court should go on to consider the interests of justice generally, and most particularly whether there is a real possibility that either the prosecution or the defence may suffer prejudice on account of the procedural failure.
-
Re Norris
“
Attempts to relitigate issues which have already been the subject of judicial decision may or may not amount to an abuse of process. Ordinarily such situations fall to be governed by the principle of estoppel per rem judicatem or of issue estoppel (admitted not to be applicable in the present case). It will be a rare case where the litigation of an issue which has not previously been decided between the same parties or their privies will amount to an abuse.
-
R v Manchester Crown Court, ex parte McDonald ; R v Leeds Crown Court, ex parte Hunt ; R v Winchester Crown Court, ex parte Forbes ex parte Wilson and Mason
“
Nor should the history be approached on the unreal assumption that all involved on the prosecution side have been able to give the case in question their undivided attention. What the court must require is such diligence and expedition as would be shown by a competent prosecutor conscious of his duty to bring the case to trial as quickly as reasonably and fairly possible.
-
B v Carlisle Crown Court
“
I conclude upon the basis of these authorities that this court does have power to consider an application brought by way of judicial review in circumstances such as those I have described, but I have concluded that it is necessary for this court to exercise any power which it possesses sparingly.
- The Crown Court (Recording and Broadcasting) Order 2020
-
Serious Crime Act 2015
...... . (1) Where it appears to a court making a confiscation order that- . (a) there is property held by the ... . (a) within any specified period the defendant applies to the Crown Court for that period to be extended, and. . . (b) the court is ......
-
Sentencing Act 2020
...... matters.Before sentencingPart 2 is about powers exercisable by a court before passing sentence.SentencingPart 3 is about court procedure when ...(1) A deferment order is available to the Crown Court or a magistrates' court in respect of an offence where—(a) the ......
-
The Criminal Procedure Rules 2015
...... of the participants in a criminal caserule 1.2The application by the court of the overriding objectiverule 1.3 . (1) The overriding objective of this ...�??(a) in all criminal cases in magistrates' courts and in the Crown Court;(b) in extradition cases in the High Court; and(c) in all cases in ......
- Liability For Costs In Crown Court Criminal Defence Cases: The Perils Of Cohabitation And Solicitor's Duties
- A Heavy Blow: U.K. Supreme Court Decision In Crown Prosecution Service v. Aquila Advisory Ltd
- A Heavy Blow: U.K. Supreme Court Decision In Crown Prosecution Service v. Aquila Advisory Ltd
- Court Of Appeal Allows Appeal On Crown Use Defence In Mobile Telecoms Patent Case
-
Crown Court preliminary hearing form: multiple defendants (Section 28)
Criminal Case Management forms including hearing forms.
-
Make a schedule of available or realisable assets
Crown Court forms including the form to extend a representation order....... realisable assets. . . . . The Crown Court at . . . . . . . Court location ......
-
Apply to extend a representation order
Crown Court forms including the form to extend a representation order....... . . . . . . The Crown Court at . . . . . . . . ......
-
28)
Criminal Case Management forms including hearing forms.... . . . . Crown Court Preliminary Hearing form . . body { font-family:'Arial ......