Drink Driving in UK Law
-
R v Drummond (Andrew)
“
First, the offence of driving while over the legal limit is not an offence which requires the court to ascertain the intent of the accused at all. Conviction follows after a scientific test which is intended to be as exact as possible. Second, in most cases such test is exact or, to the extent it is less than exact, the inexactness will work in favour of the accused.
-
Sheldrake v DPP
“
-
Hyde Park Residence Ltd v Yelland
“
I have pointed out earlier in this judgment that the basis of the defence of public interest in a breach of confidence action cannot be the same as the basis of such defence to an action for infringement of copyright. In an action for breach of confidence the foundation of the action can fall away if that is required in the public interest, but that can never happen in a copyright action.
-
R v Millington
“
Mr. Bryan's final submission, as set out in his skeleton argument, was that there was no evidence in the instant case either that the appellant was adversely affected by drink or that the amount of drink taken by him was such as would adversely affect a driver.
-
Rozakmens v Judicial Authority of Latvia
“
Miss Westcott submits that it is inevitable that if someone drives under the influence of drink he is driving whilst unfit to do so. Indeed, were it not for the decision of Court of Criminal Appeal in 1931 I would have regarded it as obvious. However, that decision appears to have stood the test of time; I have been shown no decision which qualifies its wisdom and I am bound by it.
-
Kennedy v Crown Prosecution Service
“
Where the matter under investigation is a suspected offence contrary to section 5 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 it is really conceded by Mr Jennings, and in my view rightly conceded, that in this jurisdiction the public interest requires that the obtaining of breath specimens part of the investigation cannot be delayed to any significant extent in order to enable a suspect to take legal advice.
-
Attorney General's Reference (Nos. 14 and 24 of 1993); R v Shepherd; R v Wernet
“
These reforms show an intention by Parliament to strengthen the criminal law, to reduce death on the roads by increasing the punishment available to the Courts, and by specifically targeting those who cause death whilst driving with excess alcohol. In tandem with that, causing death by the less serious form of culpable driving, characterised as careless, carries the same maximum sentence if coupled with driving whilst unfit through drink or over the limit.
-
Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022
... ... and disposal of vehicles; to make provision in connection with driving offences; to make provision about cautions; to make provision about bail ... by dangerous driving or careless driving when under the influence of drink or drugs: increased penalties ... ...
-
Road Traffic (Northern Ireland) Order 1995
... ... , includes that person as well as any other person engaged in the driving of the vehicle; ... “enactment” includes any order, regulation, ... Motor vehicles: drink and drugs Motor vehicles: drink and drugs ... Interpretation of Articles ... ...
-
Road Traffic Offenders (Northern Ireland) Order 1996
... ... (i) Article 10 (dangerous driving), ... (ii) Article 12 (careless, and inconsiderate, driving), ... charge of, a mechanically propelled vehicle when under influence of drink or drugs), ... (ii) Article 16(1)(a) or (b) (driving or attempting to ... ...
-
Road Traffic Act 1988
... ... Driving offences ... F1 1: Causing death by dangerous driving ... F24 3A: Causing death by careless driving when under influence of drink or drugs ... (1) ... ...
-
Self-reported Drink Driving and Deterrence
The use of Random Breath Testing (RBT) to deter individuals from drink driving is seen as one of the major initiatives in Australian Road Safety. Viewed within the genre of general deterrence model...
-
Examining the differences in perceived legal and non-legal factors between drink driving and drug driving
Drink and drug driving countermeasures have several similarities, yet also have a number of differences. To improve the effectiveness of these countermeasures, it is important to delineate the perc...
- Problems Facing Drink-Driving Counter Measures*
-
Increasing public confidence in Romanian probation system by developing the optimal social reintegration programmes for drink-driving offenders
The laudable evolution of the Romanian criminal punishment system from prison to non-custodial sanctions applied to drink-driving offenders is a sign of political and judicial institutional confide...
- Road Traffic Law: Enhanced Enforcement To Reduce Drink Driving?
- Reaching The Limit On Drink-Driving? Government Considers Zero-Tolerance Approach
-
From Today (1 March 2017), Drivers Caught Using Their Mobile Phones Behind The Wheel Will Face Significantly Increased Penalties
...The fixed penalty for using a handheld mobile phone while driving will double from a £100 fine and three points on the licence, to a £200 ... can have a worse impact on driving ability than being over the drink driving limit ... The content of this article is intended to provide a ... ...
-
Road Traffic Defence
... ... include the imposition of penalty points, disqualification from driving, a substantial fine and even imprisonment. We fully understand that a ... Careless driving Dangerous driving Driving whilst disqualified Drink driving Failing to provide a sample for analysis Failing to stop at the ... ...