Fair Trial in UK Law
-
R v Maxwell
“
Here a stay will be granted where the court concludes that in all the circumstances a trial will "offend the court's sense of justice and propriety" (per Lord Lowry in R v Horseferry Road Magistrates' Court, Exp Bennett [1994] 1 AC 42, 74G) or will "undermine public confidence in the criminal justice system and bring it into disrepute" (per Lord Steyn in R v Latif and Shahzad [1996] 1 WLR 104, 112F).
-
Brown v Stott (Procurator Fiscal, Dunfermline)
“
The jurisprudence of the European Court very clearly establishes that while the overall fairness of a criminal trial cannot be compromised, the constituent rights comprised, whether expressly or implicitly, within article 6 are not themselves absolute.
-
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3)
“
This establishes that the controlee must be given sufficient information about the allegations against him to enable him to give effective instructions in relation to those allegations. Provided that this requirement is satisfied there can be a fair trial notwithstanding that the controlee is not provided with the detail or the sources of the evidence forming the basis of the allegations.
-
R v Horseferry Road Magistrates Court ex parte Bennett (A.P.)
“
If the court is to have the power to interfere with the prosecution in the present circumstances it must be because the judiciary accept a responsibility for the maintenance of the rule of law that embraces a willingness to oversee executive action and to refuse to countenance behaviour that threatens either basic human rights or the rule of law. If the court is to have the power to interfere with the prosecution in the present circumstances it must be because the judiciary accept a responsibility for the maintenance of the rule of law that embraces a willingness to oversee executive action and to refuse to countenance behaviour that threatens either basic human rights or the rule of law.
-
David Shields Montgomery (Appellant) HM Advocate and Another (Respondents) Andrew Alexander Marshall Coulter (Appellant) HM Advocate and Another (Respondents)
“
The principal safeguards of the objective impartiality of the tribunal lie in the trial process itself and the conduct of the trial by the trial judge. On the one hand there is the discipline to which the jury will be subjected of listening to and thinking about the evidence. The actions of seeing and hearing the witnesses may be expected to have a far greater impact on their minds than such residual recollections as may exist about reports about the case in the media.
-
R (C) v Middlesbrough Council; A v Hoare and other appeals
“
If a complaint has been made and recorded, and more obviously still if the accused has been convicted of the abuse complained of, that will be one thing; if, however, a complaint comes out of the blue with no apparent support for it (other perhaps than that the alleged abuser has been accused or even convicted of similar abuse in the past), that would be quite another thing.
-
R v Hayward, R v Jones (Anthony), R v Purvis
“
This appellant, as it seems to us, had, clearly and expressly by his conduct, waived his right to be present and to be legally represented.
-
The Criminal Procedure Rules 2015
... ... Partrule 3.8Case preparation and progressionrule 3.9Readiness for trial or appealrule 3.10Conduct of a trial or an appealrule 3.11Duty of court ... interests of justice, and(ii) the proposed terms of the agreement are fair, reasonable and proportionate ... (4) If the proposed statement of facts ... ...
-
Coroners and Justice Act 2009
... ... to investigations and inquests under this Part;“the court of trial” means—(a) in relation to an offence (other than a service offence) ... the proposed order would be consistent with the defendant receiving a fair trial ... (5) Condition C is that the importance of the witness's ... ...
-
Human Rights Act 1998
... ... Scotland, the High Court of Justiciary sitting otherwise than as a trial court or the Court of Session;(e) in England and Wales or Northern ... or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and ... ...
-
Common Law Procedure Act 1852
... ... Nonjoinder and Misjoinder of Plaintiffs may beamended before Trial. XXXIV Nonjoinder and Misjoinder of Plaintiffs may beamended before ... If any Pleading be so framed as to prejudice, embarrass, or delay the fair Trial of the Action, the opposite Party may apply to the Court or a Judge ... ...
- Publicity and Fair Trial
-
Constrained Waiver of Trial Rights? Incentives to Plead Guilty and the Right to a Fair Trial
This article develops an interpretative framework to examine when incentives to plead guilty should be found to constrain defendant choice to waive fair trial rights under the European Convention o...
-
EU Fair Trial Rights – Progress at Last
This article discusses current moves to secure the better protection of suspects and defendants in criminal cases by means of EU legislation.
-
Judicial analytics on trial: An assessment of legal analytics in judicial systems in light of the right to a fair trial
This article informs about certain legal analytics tools that can be used to predict the outcome of cases. It identifies and assesses some challenges to the right to a fair trial that appear in cas...
- Disclosure - Striking The Right Balance Between A Fair Trial In The English Courts And The Risk Of Prosecution Abroad
-
Fair corporate criminal liability trial despite absence of company’s directing mind
The Court of Appeal has refused to grant a company leave to appeal its conviction for conspiracy to corrupt, notwithstanding that the directors who constituted the company's directing mind were not...
-
Looking into workplace investigations, part 4 – respecting the rights of bullies and harrassers (UK)
When drawing up your preliminary note of what you need to know as the product of your investigation, remember that the people being investigated have rights too. Some we will come to later in this...
-
Jail Sentence Imposed For Insider Dealing
On January 21, Neil Rollins, a former senior manager of PM Onboard Limited, a waste industry firm, was sentenced to a prison term of 27 months for insider dealing and money laundering. Rollins wa...