Media Law in UK Law
-
David Shields Montgomery (Appellant) HM Advocate and Another (Respondents) Andrew Alexander Marshall Coulter (Appellant) HM Advocate and Another (Respondents)
“
The principal safeguards of the objective impartiality of the tribunal lie in the trial process itself and the conduct of the trial by the trial judge. On the one hand there is the discipline to which the jury will be subjected of listening to and thinking about the evidence. The actions of seeing and hearing the witnesses may be expected to have a far greater impact on their minds than such residual recollections as may exist about reports about the case in the media.
-
R (Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (No. 2)
“
The public must be able to enter any court to see that justice is being done in that court, by a tribunal conscientiously doing its best to do justice according to law. For that reason, every judge sitting in judgment is on trial. So it should be, and any exceptions to the principle must be closely limited. In reality very few citizens can scrutinise the judicial process: that scrutiny is performed by the media, whether newspapers or television, acting on behalf of the body of citizens.
-
Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd
“
My conclusion is that the established common law approach to misstatements of fact remains essentially sound. The elasticity of the common law principle enables interference with freedom of speech to be confined to what is necessary in the circumstances of the case. This elasticity enables the court to give appropriate weight, in today's conditions, to the importance of freedom of expression by the media on all matters of public concern.
7. Whether comment was sought from the plaintiff. He may have information others do not possess or have not disclosed. An approach to the plaintiff will not always be necessary.
-
R (Animal Defenders International) v Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport
“
In summary, the necessity for restrictions on political/social advocacy broadcast advertising outside elections periods has been convincingly shown. It is necessary to protect the rights of others through preventing undue access to the broadcast media based on willingness and ability to pay. At root it supports the soundness of the framework for democratic public debate. The broadcast media remain pervasive and potent throughout the period between elections.
-
Michael Douglas (1st Respondent) Catherine Zeta-Jones (2nd Respondent) Nothern & Shell Plc (3rd Respondent) v Hello Ltd (1st Appellant) Hola S.A. (2nd Appellant) Eduardo Sanchez Junco (3rd Appellant)
“
Insofar as a photograph does more than convey information and intrudes on privacy by enabling the viewer to focus on intimate personal detail, there will be a fresh intrusion of privacy when each additional viewer sees the photograph and even when one who has seen a previous publication of the photograph, is confronted by a fresh publication of it.
-
Jameel and Others v Wall Street Journal Europe Sprl
“
But this does not mean that the editorial decisions and judgments made at the time, without the knowledge of falsity which is a benefit of hindsight, are irrelevant. Weight should ordinarily be given to the professional judgment of an editor or journalist in the absence of some indication that it was made in a casual, cavalier, slipshod or careless manner.
-
Data Protection Act 2018
... ... 177: Guidance about how to seek redress against media organisations ... (1) The Commissioner must produce and publish guidance about the steps that may be taken where an individual considers that a ... ...
-
The Public Contracts Regulations 2015
... ... rights over any of them;(b) for—(i) the acquisition, development, production or co-production of programme material intended for audiovisual media services or radio media services, that are awarded by audiovisual or radio media service providers, or(ii) broadcasting time or programme provision ... ...
- The Customs (Export) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019
-
Finance Act 2020
... ... (1) This section applies for the purposes of this Part ... (2) “Digital services activity” means providing—(a) a social media service,(b) an internet search engine, or(c) an online marketplace ... (3) “Social media service” means an online service that meets the ... ...
- Towards a European Media Law?
-
Mass News Media and International Law
The Mass Media Declaration approved by acclamation by 161 countries in 1978 is the only official statement on journalism ever passed at the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organ...
- Secrets, Media and the Law
- Book review: Marit Paasche and Judy Radul (eds), A Thousand Eyes: Media Technology, Law and Aesthetics
- Media Law Bulletin
- Media Law Update: Government Rejects Tougher Ticketing Laws
-
Top 10 in Law Blogs: Elizabeth Warren, UK Social Media Law, Alternative Workweeks
I’m all for promoting posts that 1.) engage other sources and 2.) demonstrate a strong opinion. Woody Woodruff of Waller does just that with his piece on Elizabeth Warren. On LXBN TV, Fox Rothschil...
- Media Law Advice: How Far Does The Duty Of Care Extend?
-
Provide supplemental information when making or responding to allegations of harm and domestic violence
Standard directions forms under the Children Act.... ... threaten violence, harass, pester or ... annoy the person who applied for ... the order, by any means, including ... social media (text messages, ... Facebook etc.) ... The diferent types of orders that can ... be applied for under section 8 of the ... Children Act 1989 are as ... ...