Personal Injury in UK Law
-
Anns v Merton London Borough Council
“
First one has to ask whether, as between the alleged wrongdoer and the person who has suffered damage there is a sufficient relationship of proximity or neighbourhood such that, in the reasonable contemplation of the former, carelessness on his part may be likely to cause damage to the latter—in which case a prima facie duty of care arises.
-
McLoughlin v O'Brian
“
The common law gives no damages for the emotional distress which any normal person experiences when someone he loves is killed or injured. Yet an anxiety neurosis or a reactive depression may be recognisable psychiatric illnesses, with or without psychosomatic symptoms. So, the first hurdle which a plaintiff claiming damages of the kind in question must surmount is to establish that he is suffering, not merely grief, distress or any other normal emotion, but a positive psychiatric illness.
-
Cartledge v E. Jopling & Sons Ltd
“
It is now too late for the courts to question or modify the rules that a cause of action accrues as soon as a wrongful act has caused personal injury beyond what can be regarded as negligible, even when that injury is unknown to and cannot be discovered by the sufferer; and that further injury arising from the same act at a later date does not give rise to a further cause of action.
-
Page v Smith
“
But it is the same test in both cases, with different applications. There is no justification for regarding physical and psychiatric injury as different "kinds" of injury. Once it is established that the defendant is under a duty of care to avoid causing personal injury to the plaintiff, it matters not whether the injury in fact sustained is physical, psychiatric or both.
-
M'Alister or Donoghue (Pauper) v Stevenson
“
You must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour. The answer seems to be persons who are so closely and directly affected by my act that I ought reasonably to have them in contemplation as being so affected when I am directing my mind to the acts or omissions which are called in question.
-
Anns v Merton London Borough Council
“
In my opinion they may also include damage to the dwelling-house itself; for the whole purpose of the byelaws in requiring foundations to be of certain standard is to prevent damage arising from weakness of the foundations which is certain to endanger the health or safety of occupants.
-
John v MGN Ltd
“
In assessing the appropriate damages for injury to reputation the most important factor is the gravity of the libel; the more closely it touches the plaintiff's personal integrity, professional reputation, honour, courage, loyalty and the core attributes of his personality, the more serious it is likely to be. The extent of publication is also very relevant: a libel published to millions has a greater potential to cause damage than a libel published to a handful of people.
-
Respond to an RTA personal injury claim
Road Traffic Act (RTA) personal injury forms including the form to contest an RTA claim.
-
Medical report - low value personal injury claims in employers' liability and public liability (£1,000 - £25,000)
Road Traffic Act (RTA) personal injury forms including the form to contest an RTA claim.
-
Claim notification - Low value personal injury claims in public liability accidents (£1,000 - £25,000)
Road Traffic Act (RTA) personal injury forms including the form to contest an RTA claim.
-
Claim notification - Low value personal injury claims in employers' liability - accident only (£1,000 - £25,000)
Road Traffic Act (RTA) personal injury forms including the form to contest an RTA claim.