Prior Restraint in UK Law

  • The Use of Force and Restraint Prior to Arrest: Limits on Police Powers to Detain
    • No. 72-5, October 2008
    • Journal of Criminal Law, The
  • Exorcising restraint: reducing the use of restrictive interventions in a secure learning disability service
    • No. 7-4, December 2016
    • Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour
    • 176-185
    Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to describe the nature and impact of a restraint reduction strategy implemented within a secure learning disability service in response to the national Positiv...
    ... ... Baseline measures were collected from 12 months of data prior toimplementation of the programme and the frequency of each category of restrictive intervention was thenmeasured prospectively on a monthly basis ... ...
  • Systemic Pressures and the Intersubjective Bases of State Autonomy in Russia: A Constructivist-Institutionalist Theory of Economic Crisis and Change
    • No. 20-2, June 2006
    • International Relations
    Over the economic crises of the 1990s, global economic understandings shifted from the early classical orthodoxy of the ‘Washington Consensus’ to a later Keynesian s...
    ... ... , combining Keynesian capital controls with classical budgetary restraint. In offering a ‘constructivist- institutionalist’ explanation for this ... of the 1998 ruble crisis legitimated capital controls, the prior alienation of state from society precluded any domestic Keynesian ... ...
  • Tracing and confiscating the proceeds of crime
    • No. 11-2, April 2004
    • Journal of Financial Crime
    • 168-185
    Discusses the prosecution of solicitor Jonathan Duff for failing to disclose his suspicions of money laundering by two clients; he was sentenced to six months imprisonment. Outlines the police’s st...
    ... ... ,000 in cash fromG within a four-month period approximatelyone year prior to G's arrest. This comprised£60,000 for D and £89,000 for a yacht.D ... law armoury has three mainweapons for recovery: con®scation, restraint andcompensation orders. Each is considered below.Con®scation ordersA ... ...
  • Canadian Ratification of the American Convention on Human Rights
    • No. 16-3, September 1998
    • Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights
    When Canada joined the Organisation of American States in 1990, it promised that it would ratify the American Convention on Human Rights in short order. Eight year later, Canada has still not taken...
    ... ... from the other international models in its prohibition of prior restraint. After setting out a more or less classic definition of ... ...
  • Privacy or Publicity? The Enduring Confusion Surrounding the American Tort of Invasion of Privacy
    • No. 55-1, January 1992
    • The Modern Law Review
    ... ... by creating a special High Court branch to deal with prior restraint cases, and would also create four further causes of ... ...
  • FREEDOM OF RELIGION AND SPEECH AND THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
    • No. 17-3, May 1954
    • The Modern Law Review
    ... ... heavy because this was a case of censorship by prior restraint, a method of suppressing ideas to be especially ... ...
  • Kaye v Robertson— a reply
    • No. 54-3, May 1991
    • The Modern Law Review
    ... ... Or consider American law. What is not noted is that prior restraint is not available in the USA. The remedy is damages ... ...
  • Index
    • Appendices
    • Vexatious Litigants and Civil Restraint Orders. A Practitioner's Handbook
    • David Giles/Maurice Rifat
    • 221-225
    ... ... disguised appeal 113 grounds for amendment 113–17 requirement for prior permission 101–8 Appeal disguised appeal 113 leave application under ... appeal court 134–5 effect of successfully appealing a civil restraint order 137 ... permission and conditional permission to appeal 126–31 ... ...
  • Douglas and others v Hello! Ltd– the Protection of Privacy in English Private Law
    • No. 64-5, September 2001
    • The Modern Law Review
    ... ... Given that there was no prior relationship between the parties and no intention of communicating ... 42 Although, he accepted that section 12(3) does make prior restraint more difficult in cases where freedom of expression is involved, he said ... ...
  • See all results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT