State Aid in UK Law
-
Rondel v Worsley
... ... But although the line between proper and improper conduct may be easy to state in general terms, it is by no means easy to draw in many borderline cases. At present it can be said with confidence in this country that where there ... ...
- R v Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, ex parte World Development Movement Ltd
-
Hinds v Attorney General of Barbados and another
... ... The appellant's recollection is different: "I say that the Judge did state the offences for which legal aid was provided and told me that arson was not one of those offences. I don't recall the Judge saying that the case was ... ...
-
R v Sheppard
... ... 6 That was the question that the jury by their verdict, answered "Yes"; not any question as to the parents' own state of mind ... 7 The Court of Appeal, regarding themselves as bound by the same line of authority, felt compelled to dismiss the ... ...
-
Three Rivers District Council v Governor and Company of the Bank of England (No. 3)
... ... It is certainly possible to state, so far as is relevant, the ingredients of the tort of misfeasance in public office. What will not be possible at this stage is to embark on the ... ...
- R (on the application of Brown) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, (Royal Mail Group Ltd and Post Office Ltd (Interested Parties); Equality and Human Rights Commission (Intervening))
-
Babanaft International Company S.A. v Bassatne
... ... And, in regard to the proper scope of the exercise of the court's discretion, the practice is clearly still in a state of development which has moved on since then. Thus, the Australian courts have not followed the policy indicated in Ashtiani by granting Mareva ... ...
-
Halford v Brookes and Another
... ... , and that because there was no reliable evidence as to the means of the defendants, the probabilities being that they were both impecunious, state funds in the form of legal aid granted to all parties should not be expended so as to obtain, at best for the plaintiff, little more than the ... ...
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire Brigades Union
-
Buttes Gas and Oil Company v Hammer; Buttes Gas and Oil Company v Hammer (No. 3)
... ... Nizam of Hyderabad (1958) Appeal Cases 379 and the State Immunity Act 1978 ... 30 JUDICIAL RESTRAINT ... 31 Now this is clear: It would be most unfortunate if these courts were to act as ... ...
See all results