Unjust Enrichment in UK Law
-
Orakpo v Manson Investments Ltd
“
My Lords, there is no general doctrine of unjust enrichment recognised in English law. It is a convenient way of describing a transfer of rights from one person to another, without assignment or assent of the person from whom the rights are transferred and which takes place by operation of law in a whole variety of widely different circumstances.
-
Banque Financiere de la Cite v Parc (Battersea) Ltd and Others
“
But I think it should be recognised that one is here concerned with a restitutionary remedy and that the appropriate questions are therefore, first, whether the defendant would be enriched at the plaintiff's expense; secondly, whether such enrichment would be unjust and thirdly, whether there are nevertheless reasons of policy for denying a remedy. But I think it should be recognised that one is here concerned with a restitutionary remedy and that the appropriate questions are therefore, first, whether the defendant would be enriched at the plaintiff's expense; secondly, whether such enrichment would be unjust and thirdly, whether there are nevertheless reasons of policy for denying a remedy.
-
Fibrosa Spolka Akcyjna v Fairbairn Lawson Combe Barbour Ltd
“
It is clear that any civilised system of law is bound to provide remedies for cases of what has been called unjust enrichment or unjust benefit, that is to prevent a man from retaining the money of or some benefit derived from another which it is against conscience that he should keep.
-
EILEEN JOAN ROSINA FILBY and MORTGAGE EXPRESS (No 2) Ltd
“
The enrichment will be at the expense of the claimant if in reality it was the claimant's money which effected the improvement. The remedy is flexible and adaptable to produce a just result. Within this framework, the remedy is discretionary in the sense that at each stage it is a matter of judgment whether on the facts the necessary elements are fulfilled.
-
Sempra Metals (formerly Metallgesellschaft Ltd) v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
“
As Professor Birks pointed out, the availability of money to use is not unequivocally enriching in the same degree as the receipt of money: Unjust Enrichment, 2nd ed, p 53. It is an imperfect way of measuring the time value of what was received prematurely. Restitution requires that the entirety of the time value of the money that was paid prematurely be transferred back to Sempra by the Revenue.
-
Lipkin Gorman (A Firm)(Original Appellants and Cross-Respondents) v Karpnale Ltd (Formerly Playboy Club of London Ltd) (Original Respondents and Cross-Appellants)
“
At present I do not wish to state the principle any less broadly than this: that the defence is available to a person whose position has so changed that it would be inequitable in all the circumstances to require him to make restitution, or alternatively to make restitution in full.
-
Uren v First National Home Finance Ltd
“
Having considered the wide ranging material put to me by Mr Matthias (wide ranging despite the relatively short period of time that this case took—argument on all issues took less than a day), it seems to me that it has not been established that the authorities have yet moved to a position in which it can be said that there is a freestanding claim of unjust enrichment in the sense that a claimant can get away with pleading facts which he says leads to an enrichment which he says is unjust.
-
Finance Act 2021
... ... in the circumstances of a particular case, produce a result that is unjust or unreasonable, the proportion is to be modified so far as necessary to ... an amount would enrich P, or(ii) whether or to what extent any enrichment of P would be unjust.(4) The reference in sub-paragraph (2) to provisions ... ...
-
Wales Act 2017
... ... law”” means the law of contract, agency, bailment, tort, unjust enrichment and restitution, property, trusts and succession.(3) In ... ...
-
The Intellectual Property (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2020
... ... part of the proprietor or a claim for restitution based upon the unjust enrichment of the proprietor, the revocation or invalidity of the ... ...
- The Law Applicable to Non-Contractual Obligations (Scotland) Regulations 2008
-
Unjust Enrichment and Contract
Benedetti v Sawiris was concerned with the measure of a quantum meruit, and in particular whether a ‘subjective’ or ‘objective’ measure should be preferred. The Supreme Court addressed the issue br...
-
Unjust Enrichment and Change of Position
Unjust enrichment is a highly debated and complex legal device, which gives rise to multiple legal problems. One of the difficulties arising within the law of unjust enrichment is that of the secur...
-
Unjust Enrichment and the Autonomy of Law: Private Law as Public Morality
Craig Rotherham reviews: Hanoch Dagan, Unjust Enrichment: A Study of Private Law and Public Values
- UNJUST ENRICHMENT AND UNJUST SACRIFICE
- J2J Commercial Series: Unjust Enrichment (Video)
- Barton V Morris: Where Contract Ends And Unjust Enrichment Begins
- James Ramsden QC Secures Success On Appeal In Unjust Enrichment ' Change Of Position Claim
- Unjust Enrichment: A Disputes Mechanism To Rebalance Climate Change-Linked Gains?