Vicarious Liability in UK Law
-
Viasystems (Tyneside) Ltd v Thermal Transfer (Northern) Ltd
“
I would hazard, however, the view that what one is looking for is a situation where the employee in question, at any rate for relevant purposes, is so much a part of the work, business or organisation of both employers that it is just to make both employers answer for his negligence.
-
Rose v Plenty
“
Similarly, when, as I shall indicate, it is important that one should determine the course of employment of the servant, the law of agency may have some marginal relevance But basically, as I understand It, the employer is made vicariously liable for the tort of his employee not because theplaintiff is an invitee, nor because of the authority possessed by the servant, but because It is a case in which the employer, having put matters into motion, should be liable if the motion that he has originated leads to damage to another.
-
Bernard v Attorney General of Jamaica
“
The correct approach is to concentrate on the relative closeness of the connection between the nature of the employment and the particular tort, and to ask whether looking at the matter in the round it is just and reasonable to hold the employers vicariously liable. In deciding this question a relevant factor is the risks to others created by an employer who entrusts duties, tasks and functions to an employee.
-
Tesco Supermarkets Ltd v Nattrass
“
A corporation has none of these: it must act through living persons, though not always one or the same person. Then the person who acts is not speaking or acting for the company. He is acting as the company and his mind which directs his acts is the mind of the company. He is an embodiment of the company or, one could say, he hears and speaks through the persona of the company, within his appropriate sphere, and his mind is the mind of the company.
-
Cox v Ministry of Justice
“
The result of this approach is that a relationship other than one of employment is in principle capable of giving rise to vicarious liability where harm is wrongfully done by an individual who carries on activities as an integral part of the business activities carried on by a defendant and for its benefit (rather than his activities being entirely attributable to the conduct of a recognisably independent business of his own or of a third party), and where the commission of the wrongful act is a risk created by the defendant by assigning those activities to the individual in question.
-
Dubai Aluminium Company Ltd v Salaam
“
Perhaps the best general answer is that the wrongful conduct must be so closely connected with acts the partner or employee was authorised to do that, for the purpose of the liability of the firm or the employer to third parties, the wrongful conduct may fairly and properly be regarded as done by the partner while acting in the ordinary course of the firm's business or the employee's employment.
-
Various Claimants v The Catholic Child Welfare Society and Others
“
The relationship that gives rise to vicarious liability is in the vast majority of cases that of employer and employee under a contract of employment. The employer will be vicariously liable when the employee commits a tort in the course of his employment. There is no difficulty in identifying a number of policy reasons that usually make it fair, just and reasonable to impose vicarious liability on the employer when these criteria are satisfied:
-
Police Act 1964
... ... of employers and of any rule of law with respect to the vicarious liability of employers, be treated as the employer of any police cadets ... ...
-
Police Act 1996
... ... of employers and of any rule of law with respect to the vicarious liability of employers, F315the chief officer of a police force shall be ... ...
-
The Regulatory Reform (Scotland) Act 2014 (Commencement No. 1 and Transitional Provision) Order 2014
... ... Section 37 ... Corporate offending ... Section 38 ... Vicarious liability for certain offences by employees and agents ... Section 39 ... ...
-
The Environmental Regulation (Relevant Offences) (Scotland) Order 2014
... ... (4) For the purposes of section 38 (vicarious liability for certain offences by employees and agents) and section 39 ... ...
-
Distorting Vicarious Liability
The note considers the decision of the Court of Appeal in Maga v The Trustees of the Birmingham Archdiocese of the Roman Catholic Church and analyses the application of the status based risk approa...
-
The role of enterprise within vicarious liability: courageous or unprincipled judicial reasoning
Sometimes speculation can lead to ignorance and this dissertation attempts to challenge the uncritically accepted assumptions about risk creation within the law of vicarious liability. The most rec...
-
Vicarious Liability and Non‐Delegable Duty for Child Abuse in Foster Care: A Step Too Far?
In NA v Nottinghamshire County Council the Court of Appeal held that a local authority is not liable under vicarious liability or for breach of a non‐delegable duty when foster parents sexually or ...
- Mixed And Vicarious Liability―A Suggested Distinction
-
Vicarious liability + intentional acts: Fraud
The United Kingdom Supreme Court is to revisit vicarious liability issues, with a bench of seven. The hearing is set down for 13 & 14 February 2018: Frederick and others (Appellants) v Positive Sol...
-
Vicarious Liability – When does it arise?
Two recent decisions of the UK Supreme Court have considered the doctrine of vicarious liability and effectively extended it to a wider range of circumstances. In the UK an employer can be held lia...
-
Vicarious liability in the UK – who am I responsible for?
Back in the day, the concept of vicarious liability (that is the situation in which one party is held liable for the acts or omissions of another) was largely confined to the employer/employee rela...
-
UKSC: Vicarious liability, akin to employment and independent contractors
Yesterday saw the UK Supreme Court hand down two significant tort law decisions. The first decision considered but rejected the vicarious liability of a bank for the acts of an independent contract...