2010-05-01
Author | Liz Campbell,James Chalmers,Frankie McCarthy,Alan Page,George L Gretton,Fiona Leverick,Daniel J Carr |
Pages | 269-305 |
DOI | 10.3366/elr.2010.0007 |
Published date | 01 May 2010 |
Date | 01 May 2010 |
In December 2008 the Cabinet Secretary for Justice asked Professor Neil Walker, Regius Professor of Public Law and the Law of Nature and Nations in the University of Edinburgh, to undertake an examination of final appellate jurisdiction in the Scottish legal system in the light of the establishment of the new United Kingdom Supreme Court by the Constitutional Reform Act 2005. In working out the new court's jurisdiction, it will be recalled, no attempt had been made to address the historical anomaly whereby appeals lay to the House of Lords from the Court of Session but not from the High Court of Justiciary. The failure to address the anomaly attracted some criticism at the time. J Chalmers, “Scottish appeals and the proposed Supreme Court” (2004) 8 EdinLR 4; G Gretton, “Scotland and the Supreme Court” 2003 SLT (News) 265; H MacQueen, “Scotland and a Supreme Court for the UK?” 2003 SLT (News) 279; C Himsworth, “A Supreme Court for the United Kingdom” 2003 SCOLAG 178. The bill was the Civil Appeals (Scotland) Bill 2006. For discussion, see C Himsworth “Presiding officer statements on the competence of bills” (2007) 11 EdinLR 397.
A reading of Professor Walker's report Scottish Government,
Model 1 – a fully autonomous appellate court system – is the independence model, which of course is not an option until such time as independence is an option. The report, however, includes an interesting discussion of what the final appellate jurisdiction in an independent Scotland might look like, and in particular how constitutional cases might be...
To continue reading
Request your trial