P&O Developments Ltd v Guy's & St. Thomas' National Health Service Trust

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1999
Date1999
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 cases
  • Britestone Pte Ltd v Smith & Associates Far East Ltd
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 28 Septiembre 2007
    ...Reinsurance Ltd (5 March 1990) (unreported) (refd) P & O Developments Ltd v Guy's and St Thomas' National Health Service Trust (1998) 62 Con LR 38 (folld) Pinnock Brothers v Lewis and Peat, Limited [1923] 1 KB 690 (refd) Rivtow Straits Limited v B C Marine Shipbuilders Limited [1978] 2 ACWS......
  • AXA Insurance UK Plc v Cunningham Lindsey United Kingdom
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • 18 Diciembre 2007
    ...was not reasonable on the facts, then, prima facie, the settlement has no evidential value (see P&O) [ P & O Developments Ltd v Guys and Thomas' National Health Service Trust [1999] BLR 3]. Moreover, the amount paid pursuant to an unreasonable settlement agreement would not be recoverable u......
  • John F Hunt Demolition Ltd v ASME Engineering Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • 27 Junio 2007
    ...taken in relation to those principles. 55 Also in 1999, there was the decision of His Honour Bowsher QC in P&O Developments Ltd v Guys and Thomas' National Health Service Trust & Ors [1999] BLR 3. In that case the Judge concluded that there were two reasons why an agreement that had been ma......
  • Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company and Bovis Lend Lease Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 5 Octubre 2004
    ...ascertainment of the amount of the liability. Reliance is placed on the judgment of H H Judge Bowsher QC in P & O Developments Ltd v. Guy's & St Thomas' National Health Service Trust [1999] BLR 3. 24 Secondly, Mr Stewart submits that it would be contrary to public policy, inconsistent with ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT