Adams v Adams
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division |
| Judgment Date | 31 July 1970 |
| Date | 31 July 1970 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
57 cases
-
TDI Metro Ltd v Fingal County Council
...of the Attorney's functions is confirmed in - and well illustrated by - by English case of Adams v Adams (Attorney General interventing) 1971 p188." 19The only authority cited for the proposition set out in the second sentence of this extract is Moore v Attorney General (1930) IR 471.. This......
-
North East Pylon Pressure Campaign Ltd v an Bord Plean?la
...has acted in the office under a general supposition of his competence to do so.” 19. It was held by Sir Jocelyn Simon P in Adams v Adams [1971] P 188 that despite the lack of modern English authority applying the doctrine, it was still part of the English common law (and had been overlooked......
-
Chain Wen Wei v Minister for Justice and The Commissioner of an Garda Siochana
...to the Government, may be of relevance in particular cases. He referred to the case of Adams v. Adams (Attorney General intervening) [1970] 3 W.L.R. 934, where Sir Jocelyn Simon stated that he thought that the Attorney General also had the right of intervention at the invitation or with th......
-
Vervaeke (formerly Messina) v Smith
...P. 29; [1961] 2 W.L.R. 221; [1961] 1 All E.R. 569. Adams v. Adams (Attorney-General intervening) [1971] P. 188; [1970] 3 W.L.R. 943; [1970] 3 All E.R. 572. Aldrich v. Attorney-General (Rogers intervening) [1968] P. 281; [1968] 2 W.L.R. 413; [1968] 1 All E.R. Bright v. Bright [1954] P. 270; ......
Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
-
The Orams Case, the Judgments Regulation and Public Policy: An English and European Law Perspective
...the ‘law of necessity’. See, for i nstance, Madzimbamuto v. Lardner-Burke [1968] 1 AC 645 (PC), per Lord Pearce at 733 A; Adams v. Adam s [1971] P 188, per Jocelyn Simon at 20 8–211; and Emin v. Yeldag [2002] 1FLR 956, per S umner J at para. 62.73 [1968] 1 AC 645 (PC). For an account of thi......
-
Economic Development Strategies and Communal Violence in Africa
...on the “Ghanaianization” of economic production. Colonial bureaucrats were quickly replaced by Ghanaian administrators (Foster & Zolberg, 1971, p. 188). Land laws also favored Ghanaians, but particularly those in the commercial classes: the influence of traditional chiefs was constrained in......
-
General Revenue Sharing and Environmental Quality
...became formalized as a national 2. Lynton Keith Caldwell, Environment: A Challenge to Modern Society (Garden City, New York: Doubleday, 1971), pp. 188, 3. Davies, Politics of Pollution, p. 120. 77 environmental program. Inherent in federally funded research. The sec- this policy and in the ......
-
Subjective Environments of Bureaucracy: Accuracies and Inaccuracies in Role-Taking Among Administrators, Legislators, and Citizens
...Administration and theChallenge to Reason," in Dwight Waldo, ed., Public Administration in a Time of Turbulence (Scranton: Chandler, 1971), pp. 188-213. 340 conception. The product of the testing process is the stabilization or themodification of one’s own Hence, attention to the role-takin......
