Adcock v Wilson
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1967 |
Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
IFX Investment Company Ltd and Others v Revenue and Customs Commissioners
...fact and (b) that there is no rule of law that requires an assembly of players in order to constitute a "game". 80. Turning specifically to Adcock, we consider it to be unpersuasive in the present case. The bingo players were all clearly playing in their local game of bingo. The question wa......
-
Revenue and Customs Comrs v Sportech Plc and Others
...[24]This understanding of the nature of "the playing of any game" is grounded in the authorities. [25]The decision in Adcock v WilsonELR[1967] 2 QB 683 provides an insight into the nature of a game as commonly understood, Widgery J saying (at p. 702):- I think that an ordinary man, when tal......
-
The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v Sportech Plc & Ors
...24. This understanding of the nature of “the playing of any game” is grounded in the authorities. 25. The decision in Adcock v Wilson [1967] 2 QB 683 provides an insight the nature of a game as commonly understood, Widgery J saying (at p.702):“ I think that an ordinary man, when talking of ......
-
The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs v Sportech PLC and others
...24. This understanding of the nature of “the playing of any game” is grounded in the authorities. 25. The decision in Adcock v Wilson [1967] 2 QB 683 provides an insight the nature of a game as commonly understood, Widgery J saying (at p.702):“ I think that an ordinary man, when talking of ......