Adekunle and Richie v Richie
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Neutral Citation | [2007] EW Misc 5 (EWCC) |
| Date | 2007 |
| Court | County Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Lee Hudson v Jayne Hathway
...where the property was in the woman's sole name because the man was apprehensive of claims by his separated wife, to Adekunle v Ritchie [2007] WTLR 1505, where an enfranchised freehold was in joint names because the elderly tenant could not obtain a mortgage on her own). [17] The starting p......
-
Amin and Another v Amin & Others
...a. The Stack v. Dowden analysis applies as between child and parent as it does between co-habiting couples: see Adekunle v. Ritchie [2007] WTLR 1505 at [65] approved by Lord Neuberger in Laskar v. Laskar [2008] EWCA Civ 347, [2008] 1 WLR 2695 at [16].I am not sure that that is quite the ri......
-
Jones v Kernott
...where the property was in the woman's sole name because the man was apprehensive of claims by his separated wife, to Adekunle v Ritchie [2007] WTLR 1505, where an enfranchised freehold was in joint names because the elderly tenant could not obtain a mortgage on her 17 The starting point is......
-
Laskar v Laskar
... ... Accordingly I think HHJ Behrens was right to conclude in Adekunle v Ritchie [2007] in the Leeds County Court that the reasoning in Stack applied to a case where ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Practical Issues when Taking Instructions and at Execution
...difficulties that had arisen in interpreting Stack v Dowden . What does in ‘the domestic consumer context’ mean? In Adekunle v Ritchie [2007] WTLR 1505, the court held that it is not limited to cohabiting couples living together in a platonic or sexual relationship but can extend to a purch......