Admiralty Commissioners v S.S. Amerika
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 19 December 1916 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 19 December 1916 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
75 cases
-
Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Hambrook
...absence from hit: work, but they have no claim for damages on that account. The general principle of law is, as Lord Parker stated in the " Amerika" case (1917 Appeal Gases, at page 5), that "the loss of A. arising out of an injury whereby is unable to perform his contract is not 4Another a......
-
Fuller v The Attorney General
...the decision of Baker v. Bolton 1 Camp 493 which was analysed by Lord Parker and Lord Sumner in Admiralty Commissioners v. S.S. Amerika [1917] A.C. 38. This is how Lord Parker stated the rule in Baker v. Bolton at page 42: “The second is that no sufficient case has been made for overruling ......
-
Grant v. Winnipeg Regional Health Authority et al., (2015) 319 Man.R.(2d) 67 (CA)
...al. v. MacDonald (2002), 201 N.S.R.(2d) 237; 629 A.P.R. 237; 2002 NSCA 30, refd to. [para. 48]. Admiralty Commissioners v. S.S. Amerika, [1917] A.C. 38 (H.L.), refd to. [para. Gayhart v. Registrar of Motor Vehicles (1956), 6 D.L.R.(2d) 474 (Man. C.A.), refd to. [para. 50]. de Montigny v. Br......
-
Ferraiuolo Estate v. Olson, 2004 ABCA 281
...General Hospital et al. (1998), 238 A.R. 1; 1998 ABQB 711, refd to. [para. 38, footnote 32]. Admiralty Commissioners v. S.S. Amerika, [1917] A.C. 38 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 39, footnote England v. Lamb (1918), 42 O.L.R. 60 (H.C.), refd to. [para. 41]. McGarry v. Canada West Coal Co. (1909),......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
Cases referred to in 1989 Part II
...State (1986) 3 N.W.L.R. (Pt.31) 714. ...................................................... 473 Admiralty Commissioners v. SS. Amerika (1917) A.C. 38. ...................................... 183 Agaran v. Olushi (1907) 1 N L R 66 ....................................................................
-
What does it mean to suffer loss? Haxton v Philips Electronics
...(MiscellaneousProvisions) Act 1934, s 1.2Reader vMolesworths Bright Clegg [2007] 1 WLR 1082.3Baker vBolton (1808) 1 Camp 493.4The Amerika [1917] AC 38 (HL), 42.bs_bs_bannerWhat does it mean to suffer loss? Haxton vPhilips Electronics© 2014 The Author. The Modern Law Review © 2014 The Modern......
-
COLLATERAL BENEFITS: DEFENDING THE CAUSAL RATIONALE.
...617 at 619, [19121 AC 673 (HL), Viscount Haldane [British Westinghouse]. (113) Admiralty Commissioners v Owners of the SS Amerika (1916), [1917] AC 38 at 61, 86 LJP 58 (HL), Lord Sumner. The scope of recoverable damages is further limited within negligence actions to only those natural loss......
-
Illegitimacy and survivorship: the case against high technology births
...had survived a negligent accident. 36 Nicholas, supra, n.5. 37 Ibid., supra, n.4. 38 See Admiralty Commissioners v. SS Amerika (Owners) [1917] A.C. 38 (HL). of estate, for those dependent upon the injured party. 39 Dependency, part of the rationale of the nineteenth century Poor Laws, rathe......