Agromet Motoimport v Maulden Engineering Company (Beds.) Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1985
Date1985
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
16 cases
  • Good Challenger Navegante SA v Metalexportimport SA
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 24 November 2003
    ...but from the date when the paying party is in breach of its implied obligation to pay the award: see e.g. Agromet Motoimport Ltd v Maulden Engineering Co (Beds) Ltd [1985] 2 All ER 436. On the facts here that would have occurred, as the judge put it, fairly shortly after the award was publ......
  • National Ability SA v Tinna Oils & Chemicals
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 11 December 2009
    ...of enforcing an award. That same assumption was the basis on which a number of other decisions proceeded, including Agromet Motoimport v Maulden Engineering Co (Beds) [1985] 1 WLR 962 and International Bulk Shipping and Services Ltd v Minerals and Metals Trading Corporation [1996] 2 Lloyds ......
  • The London Steam-Ship Owners' Mutual Insurance Association Ltd v The Kingdom of Spain
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 4 November 2021
    ...followed in later cases (see e.g. F. J. Bloemen Pty Ltd v Council of the City of Gold Coast [1973] AC 115 at 126C-F; Agromet Motoimport v Maulden Engineering Co (Beds) Ltd [1985] 1 WLR 762, at 770; The Bumbesti [2000] QB 559 at [9] to [12]; Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services Ltd......
  • International Bulk Shipping and Services Ltd v Minerals and Metals Trading Corporation of India
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Hong Kong Court Refuses Enforcement Of Mainland Award, Rejects Limitation Arguments
    • Hong Kong
    • Mondaq Hong Kong
    • 8 November 2019
    ...sought to distinguish CL v SCG [2019] 2 HKLRD 144, in which the judge relied on the English case Agromet v Maulden Engineering Ltd [1985] 1 WLR 762 to reject the suspension argument. The judge in CL stated that there was no provision in the Limitation Ordinance or the Arbitration Ordinance ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT