Airfix Footwear Ltd v Cope

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Date1978
Year1978
CourtEmployment Appeal Tribunal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
24 cases
  • Nethermere (St. Neots) Ltd v Gardiner
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 3 May 1984
    ...accounts and according to that fundamental test they are employees. It appears to us that the case is very much on all fours with Airfix Footwear v. Cope (1978) Industrial Relations Law Reports 396. In that case over 7 years and generally 5 days a week an employer had delivered to a home wo......
  • Nethermere (St. Neots) Ltd v Gardiner
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 3 May 1984
    ...accounts and according to that fundamental test they are employees. It appears to us that the case is very much on all fours with Airfix Footwear v. Cope (1978) Industrial Relations Law Reports 396. In that case over 7 years and generally 5 days a week an employer had delivered to a home wo......
  • Mary Colete John v South East Asia Insurance Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Minister for Agriculture v Barry
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 7 July 2008
    ...AHERN & ORS 5005 2 IR 577 ANTI-DISCRIMINATION (PAY) ACT 1974 S8(3) O'KELLY v TRUSTHOUSE FORTE PLC 1993 ICR 728 AIRFIX FOOTWEAR LTD v COPE 1978 ICR 1210 NETHERMERE (ST NEOTS) LTD v GARDINER 1984 ICR 612 CARMICHAEL v NATIONAL POWER PLC 1999 ICR 1226 MOORCOCK, THE 1889 14 PD 64 SHIRLAW v SOUTH......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles