Ajodha v The State; Chandree v The State; Fletcher v The State; Noreiga v The State
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1981 |
| Date | 1981 |
| Year | 1981 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
162 cases
-
Seow Choon Meng v Public Prosecutor
... ... under a small tree and she was in a drowsy state. She was naked from the waist down. Her skirt was ... of what Lord Bridge said in Seeraj Ajodha v The State ... This was an appeal from the Court ... ...
-
Public Prosecutor v Oh Laye Koh
... ... the inferences as to further facts or the state of mind of the accused which would reasonably be ... that, based on the principle in Seeraj Ajodha v State , the two statements should have been ... ...
-
Nadunjalian v Public Prosecutor
...death. Should a voire dire have been reconvened ? The only authority cited by the appellant was Ajodha v The State and other appeals, [1981] 2 All ER 193 a Privy Council decision on appeal from the Court of Appeal of Trinidad and Tobago. The appellants in that case had been convicted on dif......
-
Cletus Timothy and Others v The State
...the murder weapon and the prosecution do not seek to uphold the convictions in the absence of such evidence." 26In Ajodha v. The State [1982] A.C. 204 the question was said by the Board in a judgment delivered by Lord Bridge of Harwich to be:- "… when the prosecution proposes to tender in ......
Request a trial to view additional results
12 books & journal articles
-
Authenticating ‘Things’ in English Law: Principles for Adducing Tangible Evidence in Common Law Jury Trials
...to proof of guilt.76THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE & PROOF 281AUTHENTICATING ‘THINGS’ IN ENGLISH LAW66 Cf. Ajodha vState [1982] AC 204 at 221; RvH[1995] 2 AC 596 at 620.67 For example, RvLatimer [1977] 1 SCR 217; RvR[1994] 1 WLR 758.68 At one time judges often rejected photographs th......
-
Subject Index
.... . . . . . . . .151Adams vCanon (1621) Dyer53b n 15 . . . 143, 146Ahern vR (1988) 62ALJR 440, HCA. . . . . . . . . . 251Ajodha vThe State [1982]AC 204 . . 281,299, 301Akzo Nobel Chemicals Ltd and AkrosChemicals v EC (Case T–253/03)17 September2007. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72, 73A......
-
Subject Index
...87 . . . . . . . . 184‘Agent Orange’ Product Liability Litigation, Inre 597F Supp 740(EDNY 1984). . . . . . . . . . 118Ajodha vThe State [1982]AC 204. . . . . . . . . . . 175Akzo Nobel Chemicals Ltd and AkcrosChemicals Ltd v United Kingdom CaseC-550/07P, 14 September 2010 . . . . . . . 79, ......
-
Table of Cases
.... . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76–77, 85–86, 104–105, 204Aegis Blaze, The [1986] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 203 . . . . 51Ajodha v The State [1982] AC 204. .341–342, 343Alberta (Treasury Branches) v Ghermezian(1999) 242 AR 326, QB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .53Allan v United Kingdom (20......
Request a trial to view additional results