AK Investment CJSC v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Ltd

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
JudgeLORD COLLINS
Judgment Date10 March 2011
Neutral Citation[2011] UKPC 7
Date10 March 2011
Docket NumberAppeal No 0064 of 2009
CourtPrivy Council
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
396 cases
  • Airbus S.A.S. v Generali Italia S.p.A.
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 14 May 2019
    ...arguable. This is well established, as Lord Collins of Mapesbury explained in Altimo Holdings & Investment Ltd v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Ltd [2011] UKPC 7, [2012] 1 WLR 1804 at [81]: “A question of law can arise on an application in connection with service out of the jurisdiction, and, if th......
  • Apex Global Management Ltd (Petitioner) v Fi Call Ltd and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 20 June 2013
    ...PLC v. Nutritrek International Corp [2013] 2 WLR 398, per Lord Clarke at paragraph 164 and AK Investment CJSC v. Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Ltd [2012] 1 W.L.R. 1804 (Privy Council) per Lord Collins at paragraph 71. It is also common ground that the second requirement that a good arguable case be sho......
  • 1) Iiyama (UK) Ltd and Others v 1) Samsung Electronics Company Ltd and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 29 July 2016
    ...principles are settled. They were summarised by Lord Collins of Mapesbury in Altimo Holdings and Investment Ltd v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Ltd [2012] 1 WLR 1804 at [71] and were recently applied in Erste Group Bank AG v JSC "VMZ Red October" [2015] EWCA Civ 379. I need to consider whether: (1) th......
  • Enreach UK Ltd v Inreach Group Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 11 November 2022
    ...Ventures Ltd. 181 This point was also commented upon by Lord Collins JSC in Altimo Holdings and Investment Ltd v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Ltd [2012] 1 WLR 1804, who said at [1825]: The general rule is that it is not normally appropriate in a summary procedure (such as an application to strike out ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
12 firm's commentaries
  • Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Comparative Guide
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 24 April 2020
    ...404 at 432 [136] to 432 [137]. Ultimately, the law of England changed in Altimo Holdings and Investment Ltd v Kyrgz Mobile Tel Limited [2011] 4 All ER 1027 at 1057 [115], so that new evidence would be required for both domestic and foreign judgments. While this change is not binding on Aust......
  • IP Bulletin - February 2014
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 25 February 2014
    ...jurisdiction should stand. The test for service out involved three requirements (following AK Investment CJSC v Kyrgyz Mobile Tel Ltd [2012] 1WLR 1804): the claimant must satisfy the court that in relation to the foreign defendant there is a serious issue to be tried; that there is a good a......
  • High Court Assists Alleged Victim Of Crypto-Theft To Seek Recovery
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 15 December 2022
    ...In doing so, the court adopted the test emanating from the Privy Council in Altimo Holdings and Investment Ltd v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Ltd [2011] UKPC 7 at [71] per Lord Collins, which identified the following that there be a "serious issue to be tried on the merits"; that "there was a good argu......
  • Service Out Of The Jurisdiction: BVI Case Update
    • British Virgin Islands
    • Mondaq Virgin Islands
    • 14 July 2015
    ...management of these gateways and strategic advice from the outset remains key to ensuring that costs are sensibly incurred. Footnotes 1 [2011] UKPC 7 2 [2011] UKPC 6 2 [2011] UKPC 6 The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice s......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 books & journal articles
  • CONTEMPT ORDERS AND JUDICIAL “ATTACHMENT” OF EQUITABLE PROPERTY
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2017, December 2017
    • 1 December 2017
    ...see also The Republic of the Philippines v Maler Foundation[2014] 1 SLR 1389; Altimo Holdings and Investment Ltd v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Ltd[2011] UKPC 7; [2012] 1 WLR 1804. 45 The doctrine does not apply where the only issue is whether certain acts have occurred. See Yukos Capital Sarl v OJSC R......
  • CROSS-BORDER INSOLVENCY AND ITS IMPACT ON ARBITRATION
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2014, December 2014
    • 1 December 2014
    ...Judgments and Insolvency” (Jones Day Professorship of Commercial Law Lecture, 2013). 120 AK Investment CJSC v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Ltd [2011] UKPC 7; [2012] 1 WLR 1804 at [101], cited in Adrian Briggs, “Rubin and New Cap: Foreign Judgments and Insolvency” (Jones Day Professorship of Commercial ......
  • RATIONALISING AND SIMPLIFYING THE PRESUMPTION OF SIMILARITY OF LAWS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2016, December 2016
    • 1 December 2016
    ...forum. 60 The requirements were recently restated by Lord Collins of Mapesbury in Altimo Holdings & Investment Ltd v Kyrgiz Mobil Tel Ltd[2011] UKPC 7; [2012] 1 WLR 1804 at [71]. First, in relation to the foreign defendant there must be a serious issue on the merits to be tried. Second, the......
  • The Recognition, and Res Judicata Effect, of a United States Class Actions Judgment in England: A Rebuttal of V ivendi
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 75-2, March 2012
    • 1 March 2012
    ...vB ayat [2010] EWHC 641 (Comm) at [23],[144]; Cherney vDeripaska [2009] EWCA Civ 849 at [20]; AK Investment CJSC vKyrgyz MobilTelLtd [2011] UKPC 7 at [5].203 Rubin n 170 above at [37] perWard LJ, citing Beals, n 194 above.204 [2006] IEHC 193 at [5.9], [5.15]–[5.18] per Clarke J.205 The Guid......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT