Aktiebolaget Nordiska Lloyd v J. Brownlie & Company (Hull) Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1924
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 cases
  • The "Reunion"
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 2 August 1983
    ...charter the right to cancel did not arise before the cancelling date.In Aktiebolaget Nordiska Lloyd v J Brownlie & Co (Hull) Ltd (1925) 30 Com Cas 307 the English Court of Appeal held that notice of readiness to load was immaterial for the purposes of the cancelling clauses.It follows that ......
  • Transgrain Shipping B.v v Global Transporte Oceanico S.A. (Mexico I)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 31 January 1990
    ...for it was amply supported by authorities such as Leonis v. Rank [1908] 1 K.B. 499, 517–8; Akt. Nordiska Lloyds v. Brownlie & Co. [1925] 30 Com. Cas. 307; Christensen v. Hindustani Steel [1971] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 395, 399. It is also in accordance with the plain meaning of the chatterparty, for......
  • Bilgent Shipping PTE Ltd v ADM International SARL
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 2 October 2019
    ...particular time if the vessel was in fact ready by that time; see Aktiebolaget Nordiska Lloyd v J. Brownlie and Company (Hull) Ltd. (1925) 30 Com. Cas. 307. For the reasons which I have already summarised he submitted that in the present case the office hours requirement was not incorporate......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT