Alexander v Rayson
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Year | 1936 |
| Date | 1936 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
206 cases
-
American Home Assurance Co v Hong Lam Marine Pte Ltd
...on two decisions in support of their position: Suntoso Jacob v Kong Miao Ming [1986] SLR 59 [1986] 2 MLJ 170 and Alexander v Rayson [1936] 1 KB 169. In the former case, LP Thean J (as he then was), delivering the judgment of the Court of Appeal, said at p 174: Where a transaction which on t......
-
Mason v Clarke
...some dishonest motive, as I hold he had not, what follows? Lord Justice Denning, relying I think on the case of Alexander v. Rayson [1936] 1. K.B. 169, concluded that Mason also was affected, or perhaps I should say infected, by the taint and could not rely on his agreement. My Lords, I do......
-
21st Century Logistic Solutions Ltd ((in Liquidation)) v Madysen Ltd
...transaction itself in carrying out the fraud. This case is therefore to be distinguished from Napier v National Business Agency Ltd, Rayson v Alexander and Miller v Karminski since in the first two of those cases the contracts themselves misrepresented the true position and in the third the......
-
People's Park Development (Pte) Ltd v Lian Ya (Pte) Ltd
...fact charged and the question does not arise as to whether the leases are illegal and unenforceable.The facts in Alexander v Rayson [1935] All ER Rep 185 can be distinguished. It is no authority in favour of any contention based on s 2 of the Premiums on Leases Act nor do I find that any fr......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Illegality
...the unlawful nature of the intended conduct is unwitting, or where the 13 Wanderers’ Hockey Club v Johnson (1913), 5 WWR 117 (BCSC). 14 [1936] 1 KB 169 (CA) [ Alexander v Rayson ]. See also Napier v National Business Agency Ltd , [1951] 2 All ER 264 (CA) (employment contract — income tax) [......