Ali (Mohammed Muktar) v The Queen; Rasool (Shaik Murtuza Ali Haji Gulam) v The Queen

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1992
Date1992
Year1992
CourtPrivy Council
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
28 cases
  • Mohammad Faizal bin Sabtu v Public Prosecutor
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 10 Agosto 2012
    ...Hinds, Reginald Deaton v The Attorney General and the Revenue Commissioners [1963] IR 170 (“Deaton”), Mohammed Muktar Ali v The Queen [1992] 2 AC 93 (“Muktar Ali”) and Kok Wah Kuan). While the Legislature may prescribe the jurisdiction to be conferred on the courts, the legislative powers o......
  • Dinesh Pillai a/l K Raja Retnam v PP
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 29 Agosto 2012
    ...Public Prosecutor's prosecutorial decision: at [24]. [Observation: The decision of the Privy Council in Mohammed Muktar Ali v The Queen[1992] 2 AC 93, which considered the constitutionality of certain provisions of the Mauritian Dangerous Drugs Act 1986(‘the MDDA’), did not apply in Singapo......
  • Tapper el al v Director of Public Prosecutions el al
    • Jamaica
    • Supreme Court (Jamaica)
    • 8 Febrero 1999
  • Jay Chandler v The State
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 16 Mayo 2022
    ...falling within the range prescribed by Parliament is appropriate in the particular circumstances of his case.” See also Ali v The Queen [1992] 2 AC 93, 101–102; Mollison para 12; and Palling v Corfield (1970) 123 CLR 52, 58 (High Court of 80 The separation of powers also works to prevent ju......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • PROSECUTORIAL DISCRETION AND THE LEGAL LIMITS IN SINGAPORE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2013, December 2013
    • 1 Diciembre 2013
    ...Faizal Mohamed Abdul Kadir eds) (Academy Publishing, 2012) at p 353. 110Quek Hock Lye v Public Prosecutor[2012] 2 SLR 1012 at [28]. 111[1992] 2 AC 93. 112 Constitution of Mauritius (1968) s 72(3)(a). 113 Dangerous Drugs Act 1986 (No 32 of 1986) s 28(8) (Mauritius). 114 Section 38(4) of the ......
  • Administrative and Constitutional Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2012, December 2012
    • 1 Diciembre 2012
    ...into judicial power so as to infringe the separation of powers principle. The Privy Council decision of Mohammed Muktar Ali v The Queen[1992] 2 AC 93 (‘Mohammed Muktar Ali’) was cited in support, this being a case where the executive branch had been able to select the sentence of each indiv......
  • Administrative and Constitutional Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2021, December 2021
    • 1 Diciembre 2021
    ...[20]. 125 Public Prosecutor v Teo Ghim Heng [2021] SGHC 13 at [216]. 126 Public Prosecutor v Teo Ghim Heng [2021] SGHC 13 at [218]. 127 [1992] 2 AC 93. 128 Public Prosecutor v Teo Ghim Heng [2021] SGHC 13 at [220]. 129 Public Prosecutor v Teo Ghim Heng [2021] SGHC 13 at [223]. 130 Public Pr......
  • Administrative and Constitutional Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2018, December 2018
    • 1 Diciembre 2018
    ...Prosecutor [2018] 2 SLR 1394 at [40]. 129 Abdul Kahar bin Othman v Public Prosecutor [2018] 2 SLR 1394 at [40]. 130 [1977] AC 195. 131 [1992] 2 AC 93. 132 Abdul Kahar bin Othman v Public Prosecutor [2018] 2 SLR 1394 at [42]–[43]. 133 Abdul Kahar bin Othman v Public Prosecutor [2018] 2 SLR 1......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT