Amalgamated Building Contractors v Waltham Holy Cross U. D. C
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Year | 1952 |
Date | 1952 |
Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
20 cases
-
Alval Ltd v Attorney General of Jamaica
...contractual obligation on another party when he has impeded the performance of it: Per Lord Denning in Amalgamated Building Construction Ltd. v Waltham Holy Cross Urban District Council (1952) 2 All ER 452, in which he cited Roberts v Bury Commissioners 34 J.P. 821, as an authority for thi......
-
Re Sanpete Builders (S) Pte Ltd
...Construction (1973) Ltd [1975] 2 Lloyd`s Rep 493 and Amalgamated Building Contractors Ltd v Waltham Holy Cross Urban District Council [1952] 2 All ER 452 also establish the principle that the issue of an architect`s certificate is a condition precedent to any right in an employer or a contr......
-
Adyard Abu Dhabi v SD Marine Services
...... "It is well settled that in building contracts – and in other contracts too – when ... to these vessels and others and accepted in cross examination that it was important for him to pass ......
-
Peak Construction (Liverpool) Ltd v Mckinney Foundations Ltd
...... the plaintiffs were to be the main contractors. The first or pilot block was to be begun in ... were to be offered for the form of a building contract which contained the most one-sided, ...p. 346) ; ( Amalgamated Building Contractors -v- Waltham U.D.C. 1952 ......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Contract administration
...Market Co (1891) Hudson’s BC (4th edition, volume 2) 170. See also Amalgamated Building Contractors Co Ltd v Waltham Holy Cross UDC [1952] 2 All ER 452 at 455–456, per Romer LJ. Compare Fairield Sentry Ltd v Migani [2014] UKPC 9 at [27] (Lord Sumption). 307 Walker v Black (1879) 5 VLR (L) 7......
-
CURRENT ISSUES IN CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT CLAIMS IN SINGAPORE AND THE TROPICON’S CASE
...Council(1900) 19 NZLR 1; Miller v London County Council(1934) 50 TLR 479; Amalgamated Building Contractors Ltd v Waltham Holy Cross UDC[1952] 2 All ER 452; see also Chow Kok Fong, “The Validity of Retrospective Extensions of Time for the Completion of Construction Works [1981] 2 MLJ 1ix. 42......