American Express International Banking Corporation v Hurley

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1985
Date1985
Year1985
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
49 cases
  • Public Bank Bhd v Ng Chee Ping
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1998
  • Capital Home Loans Ltd v Angela Margaret Searles (Defendant/Applicant)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 5 July 2016
    ...made expressly clear by Clause 9.5.2 of the mortgage deed. But she relies on the decision of Mann J in the case of American Express International Banking Corporation v Hurley [1985] 3 All ER 564–575 as authority for the proposition that notwithstanding the initial appointment of receivers a......
  • Barclays Bank Plc v Kingston
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 17 March 2006
    ...appeal by defendants against summary judgment against them, so that strictly the issue was whether there was an arguable defence); American Express v Hurley [1985] 3 All ER 564; and, more recently, by the Court of Appeal in Skipton Building Society v Stott [2000] 1 QB 261 at [21]. I do not......
  • CI Holdings Bhd v Jabatan Pemegang Harta; Re Sama Company Sdn Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1992
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 books & journal articles
  • Can Complex Contracts Effectively Replace Bankruptcy Principles? Why Interpretation Matters.
    • United States
    • American Bankruptcy Law Journal Vol. 92 No. 4, September 2018
    • 22 September 2018
    ...al., supra note 55, [section] 17.50, at 635. In the U.S., see U.C.C. [section] 9-610 (b). (60) Am. Express Int'l Baking Corp. v. Hurley [1986] BCLC 52, (61) Cuckmere Brick Co. v. Mut. Fin. Ltd. [1971] Ch 949. (62) UCC [section] 9-610 (b). (63) Parker-Tweedale v. Dunbar Bank plc [1991] Ch 12......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Law of Insolvent Partnerships and Limited Liability Partnerships Contents
    • 29 August 2015
    ...v Lubrani (No 2) [1998] BCC 264 584, 585 American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd [1975] AC 396 131 American Express Banking Corp v Hurley [1985] 3 All ER 564 214 Anglo American Insurance Co Ltd, Re [2001] 1 BCLC 755 30, 38 Anglo-Continental Supply Co Ltd [1922] 2 Ch 723 35, 36 Antal Internationa......
  • Receivership
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Law of Insolvent Partnerships and Limited Liability Partnerships Contents
    • 29 August 2015
    ...and Raja v Austin Gray (a firm) [2002] EWCA Civ 1965, [2003] Lloyds Rep PN 126. 134 See also American Express Banking Corp v Hurley [1985] 3 All ER 564 in relation to receivers other than administrative receivers. breached his duty of care, 135 but he may of course have an action against th......
  • DUTIES OF A MORTGAGEE AND A RECEIVER: WHERE SINGAPORE SHOULD AND SHOULD NOT FOLLOW ENGLISH LAW
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2008, December 2008
    • 1 December 2008
    ...Bank v Walker [1982] 1 WLR 1410 (CA) at 1415 (Lord Denning MR), 1418 (Watkins LJ); American Express International Banking Corp v Hurley[1985] 3 All ER 564 at 571; Knight v Lawrence[1993] BCLC 215 at 221. 79 [1982] 1 WLR 1410 (CA). 80 Ibid, at 1415. In Silven Properties Ltd v Royal Bank of S......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT