AMF International Ltd v Magnet Bowling Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1968 |
| Year | 1968 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
26 cases
- Gillespie Bros. & Company Ltd v Roy Bowles Transport Ltd
-
Mohd Sainudin bin Ahmad v Consolidated Hotels Ltd and Another
...site. The architects were independent contractors and not agents of the first defendants: see AMF International Ltd v Magnet Bowling [1968] 1 WLR 1028, and any control which they might have by virtue of their position could not be said to be the control of the first defendants.Counsel for t......
- Consolidated Hotels Ltd and Another; Mohd Sainudin bin Ahmad
-
Gillespie Bros. & Company Ltd v Roy Bowles Transport Ltd
...been applied by Mr. Justice Slade in Walters v. Whessoe & Shell defining Co. (unreported 1960) and by Mr. Justice Mocatta in A.N.F. International v. Magnet Bowling (1968) 1 W.L.R. 1028 at page 1055. So explicit were the words of the Privy Council that I felt myself, at first, that we ought ......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
The site
...English law, on the control 67 (1989) 48 BLR 96. 68 See, eg, Colbart Ltd v Kumar (1992) 59 BLR 89 at 100, per Judge hayne Forbes QC. 69 [1968] 1 WLR 1028. 70 Viasystems (Tyneside) Ltd v hermal Transfer (Northern) Ltd [2006] 2 QB 510 at 528 [52], per May LJ, at 529 [55] and 536–537 [79], per......
-
Contract administration
...Model Form Contract (2010 edition) – Comments and Comparisons” [2011] ICLR 138 at 143. 32 AMF International Ltd v Magnet Bowling Ltd [1968] 1 WLR 1028 at 1044, per Mocatta J. In Richard Reed (Transport) Ltd v Barpro Group plc [2000] All ER (D) 1044 at [157], HHJ Wilcox remarked that an owne......