An Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Subjiciendum and The Extradition Act 1989
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) |
| Neutral Citation | [2002] EWHC 2326 (Admin) |
| Year | 2002 |
| Date | 2002 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
6 cases
-
Min for Justice v Gorman
...[2006] 43 EHRR 621 considered; Minister for Justice v Gheorghe [2009] IESC 76, (Unrep, SC, 18/11/2009) and Asliturk v Turkey [2002] EWHC 2326 (Admin), (Unrep, English HC, McCombe J, 8/11/2002) distinguished; Cannon v Minister for the Marine [1991] 1 IR 82 and Eviston v DPP [2002] 3 IR 260 ......
-
Peter Weinzierl v Government of the United States of America
...to an arguable abuse of process? In the most recent written submission on behalf of the appellant what was said in Asliturk v Turkey [2002] EWHC 2326 (Admin) at [24] is cited, the passage dealing with the failure of the requesting authority to respond to evidence from the requested person. ......
-
Peter Weinzierl v Government of the United States of America & Anor
...to an arguable abuse of process? In the most recent written submission on behalf of the appellant what was said in Asliturk v Turkey [2002] EWHC 2326 (Admin) at [24] is cited, the passage dealing with the failure of the requesting authority to respond to evidence from the requested person. ......
-
Michael Rottman and The Governor of HMP Brixton and The Government of Germany
...issue was the legal mechanism by which an academic extradition exercise could be prevented. 38 In Asliturk v Government of Turkey [2002] EWHC 2326 (Admin), a decision dated 8 November 2002, this court was concerned with a dispute of fact. The applicant contended that the accusations were no......
Get Started for Free
