Analysing the Commission's Guidance on Enforcement Priorities in Applying Article 102 TFEU — An Efficiency Defence for Abusive Behaviour of Dominant Undertakings?

AuthorAnna-Lena Baur
DOI10.1177/1023263X1201900307
Published date01 September 2012
Date01 September 2012
Subject MatterArticle
19 MJ 3 (2012) 421
ANALYSING THE COMMISSION’S GUIDANCE
ON ENFORCEMENT PRIORITIES IN APPLYING
ARTICLE 102 TFEU – AN EFFICIENCY
DEFENCE FOR ABUSIVE BEHAVIOUR
OF DOMINANT UNDERTAKINGS?
A-L B*
ABSTRACT
Considering that in an EU competition law context, dominant undertakings have
traditionally been placed under a more stringent regime than their non-dominant
counterparts, th e introduction of an e ciency d efence in the latest Commission’s Guidance
on the application of Article102 TFEU can be evaluated as a true novelty. Given the succe ss
of the Article101-regime it is not surprising that the requirements for using the e ciency
defence are very similar to the preconditions asked for under Article101(3) TFEU. While
it should be welcomed that e ciencies are acknowledged in an Article102-context, it
is questionable whether a defence that is modelled so closely along the lines of a regime
applicable to non-dominant undertakings will be equally e ective for dominant market
participants.  e following article gives an exhaustive overvie w of the development and
possible employment of the newly introduced e ciency defence for dominant under takings.
While familiarizing the reader with the Guidance in general and the requirements of
the e ciency defence in particul ar, the main focus of this article will be on whethe r the
e ciency defence in its cur rent form can be a useful tool for dominant undertakings in
practice.
Keywords: Art icles101 & 102 TFEU; Commission’s Guidance; dominant underta kings;
e ciency defence; EU competition law
* Anna-Lena Bau r is currently employed at Konstanz Uni versity in Germany and holds a LL B/LLM in
European Law.  e author wou ld like to especial ly thank Professor Phedon Nicol aides for his support
and valuable i nput.
Anna-Lena Baur
422 19 MJ 3 (2012)
§1. IN T RO DUCT I ON
To give dominant undertakings t he possibility to justif y their anti-competitive behav iour
seemed – at least at  rst – to be unforeseen by t he dra ers of the Europe an Treaties.
Contrary to t he procedure under Article101 TFEU,1 where agreements of undertakings
can be excluded from the applic ation of the article i f all requirements of pa ragraph 3
are met, no Article 102(3) TFEU exists. Nevertheless, despite the abs ence of a general
exclusion clause in the Treaty, economic practice has shown that certa in forms of
seemingly anti-competitive behaviour are capable of creating signi cant e ciencies. In
the past, the Europea n Commission has repeatedly been c riticized for not acknowledging
these e ciencies by declaring cer tain forms of behaviour of domina nt undertak ings
abusive per se.
When reviewi ng the applicability of Article101 and Art icle102 TFEU, the European
Commission nally reacted. In December 2009 t he latest Guidance on the application of
Article102 TFEU was published and defence mechan isms for anti-competitive behaviour
of dominant undertakings were introduced. Trying to implement a more e ects-based
and economic approach to the application of Ar ticle102, the Commission announced that
it might be will ing consider two claims of e ciencies: t he  rst being bas ed on necessity
and the second on e ciencies. In order to be able to judge wh ich form of behaviour may
be eligible for justi cat ion under the e ciency de fence, the Comm ission introduced four
preconditions which a dominant undert aking has to f ul l in order to bene t from the
e ciency defence. It is striking but not surprising that these four requirements of the
Guidance very closely mi rror the criteria required under Art icle101(3) TFEU.2
In a European Union law setti ng, the leeway for dominant undertaki ngs to compete
strongly on the market has tr aditionally been li mited. Bearing a sp ecial responsibility
towards other market par ticipants, they a re prohibited from taking c ertain forms of
action that would be legal i f implemented by their non-dominant competitors.  e
e c iency defence as introduced in the C ommission’s Guidance seems to open up
attractive new ways for dominant undertakings to keep up with their competitors, and
for implementing strategies they have so fa r not been allowed to employ.  is expect ation,
however, will only materialize i f the e ciency defence is really applicable in practice.
e purpos e of the article at hand is to cr itically re ect on the e ciency defence and
its prerequisites in order to explore how much potential for practical appl icability the new
tool bears.  e underlying idea is to provide the reader wit h a starti ng point for an own
1 Treaty on the Function ing of the European Union (Conso lidated Version), [2008] OJ C 115/47.
2 Not only is the content of the c onditions of the e cienc y defence very similar t o Article101(3) TFEU,
but the Commiss ion itself refers in it s latest Guidanc e on Article 102 TFEU to the interpretative
Guidelines for A rticle101 TFEU. Compare: Commun ication from the Commi ssion – Guidance on the
Commission’s enforcement priorities in applying Article82 of the EC Treaty to abusive exclusionary
conduct by dominant undertakings, [2009] OJ C 45/7, para. 30 f n. 3.  is source will in the following
be referred to as ‘Comm ission Guidance Paper.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex