Ancell v McDermott

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date29 January 1993
Date29 January 1993
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)

Court of Appeal

Before Lord Justice Nourse, Lord Justice Beldam and Sir John Megaw

Ancell and Another
and
McDermott and Others

Negligence - duty of care - traffic police - road hazard - no duty to warn

Limit to police duty of care over hazards

The police when carrying out traffic duties did not owe a duty of care to give warnings so as to protect road users from hazards of which the police officers had become aware but which were not created by them and for which they were not responsible.

The Court of Appeal so held in allowing appeals by the Chief Constables of Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire from a judgment of Mr Justice Garland in January 1991 whereby he had refused to strike out an action against them by the plaintiffs, Lawrence Ancell, in his personal capacity and also as administrator of the estate of Dawn Ancell, and Katie Ancell, for disclosing no reasonable cause of action.

Mr Bernard Livesey, QC and Mr Jeremy Stuart-Smith for the chief constables; Mr Piers Ashworth, QC and Mr Jonathan Harvey for the plaintiffs; the first defendant, Michael McDermott, and the fourth defendants, Alpha Bulk Liquids Ltd, did not appear and were not represented.

LORD JUSTICE BELDAM said that the proceedings arose from a fatal traffic accident in the early hours of August 17, 1988. For the purposes of the appeal it had to be taken as having occurred in the circumstances set out.

Aluminium tubing fell from the fourth defendants' bulk carrier on to the road at a roundabout at Airport Way, Luton. The first defendant, driving his car...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
27 cases
  • Abdul Malek bin Idrus v Tan Jee Han
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2013
  • Chief Constable of Hertfordshire Police v. Van Colle et al.,
    • Canada
    • 30 July 2008
    ...24, refd to. [paras. 45, 72, 92, 106, 123]. Clough v. Bussan, [1990] 1 All E.R. 431 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 50]. Ancell v. McDermott, [1993] 4 All E.R. 355 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Knightley v. Johns, [1982] 1 W.L.R. 349 (C.A.), refd to. [paras. 53, 79]. Costello v. Chief Constable of the No......
  • Brooks v Metropolitan Police Commisioner
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 21 April 2005
    ...principle enunciated in Hill has been applied in a number of Court of Appeal decisions: Alexandrou v Oxford [1993] 4 All ER 328, 340J; Ancell v McDermott [1993] 4 All ER 355, at 365G-H. Osman v Ferguson [1993] 4 All ER 344; Cowan v Chief Constable for Avon and Somerset Constabulary (2002......
  • Leach v Chief Constable of Gloucestershire Constabulary
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 31 July 1998
    ...the breach of a duty of care. Most of them were cases in which claims were brought in respect of physical injury or death ( Ancell v McDermott [1993] 4 All ER 355; Osman v Ferguson [1993] 4 All ER 344; Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police [1990] 2 QB 283; Knightley v Johns......
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries